2022
DOI: 10.5194/acp-22-535-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assimilating spaceborne lidar dust extinction can improve dust forecasts

Abstract: Abstract. Atmospheric mineral dust has a rich tri-dimensional spatial and temporal structure that is poorly constrained in forecasts and analyses when only column-integrated aerosol optical depth (AOD) is assimilated. At present, this is the case of most operational global aerosol assimilation products. Aerosol vertical distributions obtained from spaceborne lidars can be assimilated in aerosol models, but questions about the extent of their benefit upon analyses and forecasts along with their consistency with… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Case studies assimilating lidar vertical profiles show a 20-40% improvement in the simulation of volcanic plume distributions, aerosol backscatter, aerosol number concentration, and surface mass concentrations (Escribano et al 2022;Ye et al 2021;El Amraoui et al 2020;Hughes et al 2016;Sekiyama et al 2010;Zhang et al 2011). Operational and quasi-operational global aerosol models do not currently assimilate lidar vertical profiles since data are not available in NRT and the data lacks the spatiotemporal information needed to improve model predictions on a global scale (Benedetti et al 2018).…”
Section: Scientific and Operational Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case studies assimilating lidar vertical profiles show a 20-40% improvement in the simulation of volcanic plume distributions, aerosol backscatter, aerosol number concentration, and surface mass concentrations (Escribano et al 2022;Ye et al 2021;El Amraoui et al 2020;Hughes et al 2016;Sekiyama et al 2010;Zhang et al 2011). Operational and quasi-operational global aerosol models do not currently assimilate lidar vertical profiles since data are not available in NRT and the data lacks the spatiotemporal information needed to improve model predictions on a global scale (Benedetti et al 2018).…”
Section: Scientific and Operational Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, work is being done to allow the chemistry to be solved using runtime configuration approaches (Dawson et al, 2021) and exploiting GPUs heterogeneous architectures (Guzmán-Ruiz et al, 2020). (Hunt et al, 2007;Miyoshi and Yamane, 2007;Schutgens et al, 2010;Di Tomaso et al, 2017;Escribano et al, 2022) coupled to the model through I/O routines, and which requires the model to be run in an ensemble mode. These complex simulations are handled through the Autosubmit workflow manager (Manubens-Gil et al, 2016;Uruchi et al, 2021), which allows also to process the necessary input files, and to post-process and archive the model outputs in an easy way.…”
Section: The Atmospheric Chemistry Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is the reference forecast system of the Barcelona Dust Forecast Center (https://dust.aemet.es/), and the Regional Center for Northern Africa, the Middle East and Europe (NAMEE) of the Sand and Dust Storms Warning Advisory and Assessment System (SDS-WAS) of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Moreover, MONARCH has the capability to improve dust estimates through data assimilation techniques, both using column integrated (Di Tomaso et al, 2017;Di Tomaso et al, 2022) and vertically resolved (Escribano et al, 2022) satellite dust retrievals, and it has been recently used to derive a dust regional reanalysis for the NAMEE domain (Di Tomaso et al, 2022) with unprecedented high resolution.…”
Section: Representation Of the Dust Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2009) on the CALIPSO level-2 version 4 products (Winker et al, 2009). The LIVAS pure-dust product has been used in a variety of dust-oriented studies, including the investigation of the dust sources and the seasonal transition of the dust transport pathways (Marinou et al, 2017;Proestakis et al, 2018), the evaluation of the performance of atmospheric and dust transport models (e.g., Tsikerdekis et al, 2017;Solomos et al, 2017;Konsta et al, 2018), the evaluation of new satellitebased products (e.g., Georgoulias et al, 2016;Chimot at al., 2017;Georgoulias et al, 2020;Gkikas et al, 2021), and dust assimilation experiments (Escribano et al, 2022). Herein, the LIVAS pure-dust extinction product is used for the assessment of the simulated dust vertical patterns.…”
Section: Livas Productmentioning
confidence: 99%