Abstract:A swine resource family was constructed at the National Institute of Animal Industry, Japan, in order to determine the genetic regions responsible for economically important traits, including fetus development. To identify genes expressed in the early stage of embryo development, we cataloged and mapped genes expressed in a 28-day-old normal pig embryo. In this effort, we have mapped 64 genes, which have map information in human genome onto a swine radiation hybrid (RH) map, IMpRH. These mappings provided addi… Show more
“…As shown in Supplementary Table 1 (www.karger.com/doi/ 10.1159/000087523), ITIH2 was mapped to SSC10, which was consistent with both the somatic-hybrid assignment and the genetic-linkage analysis (Ponsuksili et al, 2001;Nonneman and Rohrer, 2003), but inconsistent with the mapping results of Karnuah et al (2001). Therefore, to confirm the results of this study, the fragment amplified with the primer pair in the study of Karnuah et al (2001) was sequenced, revealing that the sequence of that fragment, though of the expected size, differed from the sequence used for the primer design.…”
Section: Assignment Of Genes To Swine Chromosomesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…ITIH2 was shown to reside on SSC10 by somatic hybrid assignment and genetic-linkage analysis (Ponsuksili et al, 2001;Nonneman and Rohrer, 2003), whereas Karnuah et al (2001) mapped it on SSC3 using the IMpRH panel. Therefore, in order to investigate the discrepancy in its chromosomal position, a primer pair was redesigned for ITIH2 in the present study.…”
Economically important traits such as growth and backfat in pigs have been shown to be influenced by genes in swine chromosome (SSC) 10q12→qter corresponding to human chromosome (HSA) 10p. However, since gene information in the swine chromosomal region was limited, we attempted to generate a dense comparative map between SSC10 and HSA10 by mapping the 115 genes of HSA10 to a swine RH map (IMpRH map). In the mapping ten genes were assigned to SSC10, 88 to SSC14, and one to SSC3. One gene was suggested to link to SSC3, and another to SSC9. The correspondences between HSA10 and SSC10 and between HSA10 and SSC14 were essentially consistent with the observations obtained from bi/uni-directional chromosome painting or other results. This study further indicated that a large number of intrachromosomal rearrangements occurred in the synteny-conserved regions following species separation.
“…As shown in Supplementary Table 1 (www.karger.com/doi/ 10.1159/000087523), ITIH2 was mapped to SSC10, which was consistent with both the somatic-hybrid assignment and the genetic-linkage analysis (Ponsuksili et al, 2001;Nonneman and Rohrer, 2003), but inconsistent with the mapping results of Karnuah et al (2001). Therefore, to confirm the results of this study, the fragment amplified with the primer pair in the study of Karnuah et al (2001) was sequenced, revealing that the sequence of that fragment, though of the expected size, differed from the sequence used for the primer design.…”
Section: Assignment Of Genes To Swine Chromosomesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…ITIH2 was shown to reside on SSC10 by somatic hybrid assignment and genetic-linkage analysis (Ponsuksili et al, 2001;Nonneman and Rohrer, 2003), whereas Karnuah et al (2001) mapped it on SSC3 using the IMpRH panel. Therefore, in order to investigate the discrepancy in its chromosomal position, a primer pair was redesigned for ITIH2 in the present study.…”
Economically important traits such as growth and backfat in pigs have been shown to be influenced by genes in swine chromosome (SSC) 10q12→qter corresponding to human chromosome (HSA) 10p. However, since gene information in the swine chromosomal region was limited, we attempted to generate a dense comparative map between SSC10 and HSA10 by mapping the 115 genes of HSA10 to a swine RH map (IMpRH map). In the mapping ten genes were assigned to SSC10, 88 to SSC14, and one to SSC3. One gene was suggested to link to SSC3, and another to SSC9. The correspondences between HSA10 and SSC10 and between HSA10 and SSC14 were essentially consistent with the observations obtained from bi/uni-directional chromosome painting or other results. This study further indicated that a large number of intrachromosomal rearrangements occurred in the synteny-conserved regions following species separation.
“…When this observation is combined with the findings of Karnuah et al (2001), in which many breaks were found in the "conserved synteny" regions between human and swine chromosomes demonstrated by a recent extensive study (Pinton et al, 2000), it is predicted that synteny conservation between human and swine chromosomes would be much more fragmentary than that reported by Pinton et al (2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…inra.fr/lgc/pig/compare/HSA.htm). As a result, a number of breaks in conservation of synteny between human and swine chromosomes have been demonstrated (Pinton et al, 2000;Karnuah et al, 2001), which could not be predicted from the correspondence revealed by ZOO-FISH (Goureau et al, 1996). In the present study, using 910 sequence-tagged sites (STSs) from human chromosome (HSA) 1p36 → p35 (35 Mbp) (Chen et al, 2001), we have attempted to construct a more detailed comparative map between this human chromosome and its corresponding swine chromosome (SSC) 6 region, which appears to harbor QTLs (Quantitative Trait Loci) for backfat thickness (Rohrer, 2000) and average daily gain (Bidanel et al, 2001).…”
Construction of a comprehensive comparative map between swine and human chromosomes is a prerequisite, in order to select candidate swine genes for traits from the human genome database as well as to understand the evolutionary process of the two species. The present study attempted to use 910 sequence-tagged sites (STSs) localized in human chromosome (HSA) 1p36→p35 (35 Mbp) for radiation hybrid (RH) mapping to swine chromosomes (SSCs). Out of the 910 STSs subjected to amplification of swine orthologues, primer pairs for 13 STSs were found to amplify the respective orthologues and the STSs were assigned to SSCs. Eleven STSs were assigned to SSC6 in the same order as that in HSA1: SSC6cen–(SHGC–150)–(A006H31)–(X82877)–(A007E03)–(IB404)–(stGDB:371372)–(stSG31658)–(A009Q18)–(stSG14201/A009C01)–(H08335)–qter. One of the remaining two STSs, WI-20819, was assigned to SSCX, and the other, R91D18R, was not linked to any first-generation markers of the IMpRH map with a lod score greater than 3.
“…Moreover mapping on the radiation hybrid panel IMpRH is in full swing (Hawken et al, 1999;Karnuah et al, 2001;Korwin-Kossakowska et al, 2002;Krause et al, 2002;Rink et al, 2002;Lahbib-Mansais et al, 2003) and 6000 markers are already mapped. A first generation RH comparative map of the porcine and human genome has already been published (Rink et al, 2002;Lahbib-Mansais et al, 2003) but this map includes only EST markers.…”
In this study we examined homologies between 1,735 porcine microsatellites and human sequence. For 1,710 microsatellites we directly used the sequence flanking the repeat available in GenBank. For a set of 305 microsatellites, a BAC library was screened and end-sequencing provided 461 additional sequences. Altogether 2,171 porcine sequences were tentatively aligned with the sequence of the human genome using the fasta program. Human homologies were observed for 652 microsatellite loci and porcine chromosome assignments available for 623 microsatellites provide useful links in the human and pig comparative map. Moreover for 92 STS, a significant sequence similarity was detected using at least two sequences and in all cases corresponding human locations were consistent. The present study allowed the integration of anonymous markers and the porcine linkage map into the framework of the comparative data between human and porcine genomes (http://w3.toulouse.inra.fr/lgc/pig/msat/). Moreover all conserved syntenic segments were defined on human chromosomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.