2003
DOI: 10.5711/morj.8.1.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assigning Nuclear Weapons with Reactive Tabu Search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some problems of interest within this framework include transmission problem in networks (Wieselthier et al, 1992, Cassandras and Julka, 1995, Mishra et al, 2007, spreading code design problem (Krishnamurthy et al, 2004), assignment problem of people evacuation (Francis, 1981), facility locating problem (Ermoliev and Leonardi, 1982), weapons assignment problem (Cullenbine et al, 2003), antenna selection problem (Liu et al, 2012), and, more generally, distributing a discrete amount of resources to a finite number of users in the face of uncertainty (Castanon andWohletz, 2009, Wang andGao, 2010).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some problems of interest within this framework include transmission problem in networks (Wieselthier et al, 1992, Cassandras and Julka, 1995, Mishra et al, 2007, spreading code design problem (Krishnamurthy et al, 2004), assignment problem of people evacuation (Francis, 1981), facility locating problem (Ermoliev and Leonardi, 1982), weapons assignment problem (Cullenbine et al, 2003), antenna selection problem (Liu et al, 2012), and, more generally, distributing a discrete amount of resources to a finite number of users in the face of uncertainty (Castanon andWohletz, 2009, Wang andGao, 2010).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some consider that deterministic preemptive goal programming is only applicable when the multiple, competing goals have vastly divergent priorities; however, we have found that it works well to ensure that some essential conditions are achieved for a solution to be viable. For instance, the Air Force has successfully applied deterministic preemptive goal programming to problems without vastly divergent priorities in conventional warfare (Gallagher & Kelly, 1991), nuclear warfare (Cullenbine et al, 2003), and budgeting (Nestico et al, 2020). We have also found that effective deterministic preemptive goal formulations define essential goals as high priorities that must be met without reducing the feasible decision space to a single or relatively few points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, our leaders and their analysts segregated studies of conventional and nuclear wars. Most military models only represent conventional forces, such as Gallagher and Kelly, 1 and similarly models of nuclear forces, for example Cullenbine et al, 2 do not include any conventional forces. Even when apparently common terms, such as probability of damage, are used, the definitions of damage are different and incommensurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%