2017
DOI: 10.1080/09720502.2017.1358881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assets evaluation credibility method based on the interpersonal relationship model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To a certain extent, the algorithm has achieved excellent restoration visual quality, but it takes a long time. And because the algorithm itself is too dependent on the similarity between the restored blocks and the sample blocks, the optimal matching for the restored block is not necessarily accurate [2,3,5,7,20]. Chandrasekaran et al proposed a linear addition function to the gradient and the logarithm of gradient to determine the restoration priority algorithm for the restored block.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a certain extent, the algorithm has achieved excellent restoration visual quality, but it takes a long time. And because the algorithm itself is too dependent on the similarity between the restored blocks and the sample blocks, the optimal matching for the restored block is not necessarily accurate [2,3,5,7,20]. Chandrasekaran et al proposed a linear addition function to the gradient and the logarithm of gradient to determine the restoration priority algorithm for the restored block.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%