2017
DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1282143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asset pricing and downside risk in the Australian share market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study period runs from 2 January 2020 to 30 April 2020, or 83 trading days for each company. 2 Following Alles and Murray (2017) , firms with no trading data on more than 50% of trading days in the given period have been removed. Hence, the final sample consists of 134 companies.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study period runs from 2 January 2020 to 30 April 2020, or 83 trading days for each company. 2 Following Alles and Murray (2017) , firms with no trading data on more than 50% of trading days in the given period have been removed. Hence, the final sample consists of 134 companies.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, for calculating the cost of equity, Foong and Goh (2012) compared various CAPM measures for an emerging market and concluded that downside beta is the most relevant measure. Recently, many researches have tested DCAPM in asset pricing like Alles and Murray (2017) tested downside, upside beta and co-skewness in the Australian equities market and found that they are priced in Australian stock market, however, downside and upside beta are not related to each other. In Pakistan, Raza (2018) and Rashid and Mehmood (2018) conducted researches on Pakistan stock market and financial institutions and provide evidence of a positive and statistically significant risk-return relationship.…”
Section: Downside Beta Capm (Dcapm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These circumstances have led financial economists and academic practitioners to develop new pricing theory/framework for asset pricing and managing risk, in the form of downside risk measures. These theories include the lower-partial moment framework of Bawa and Lindenberg [17], the loss aversion of Kahneman and Tversky [29] in their prospect theory, the disappointment aversion of Gul [17], and the mean semi-variance framework of Estrada [15,20,40].…”
Section: Mean Semi-variance Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most past oil-related studies employ standard multifactor asset pricing models, which implicitly assume that the underlying distribution of returns is normal or symmetrical (e.g., [11,14,18,19], among others). While numerous prior studies recognize that stock returns are non-normally distributed especially within the context of emerging markets, at best, these studies only include additional risk measures to proxy for downside risk such as skewness and kurtosis in the analysis modelled using standard asset pricing model [2,20]. In those studies, the asset pricing framework and factor are still based on co-movements, and the inclusion of co-skewness and co-kurtosis are just non-linear effects of risk factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation