Asset confiscation in Europe – past, present, and future challenges

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to paint a general picture of the asset confiscation regimes used in Europe and to outline potential challenges, practical and related to issues of principle, associated with the current development with regard to the confiscation of the proceeds of crime and criminals’ proceeds. Design/methodology/approach The paper endeavours to analyse the various steps of the confiscation process, and the various approaches to the confiscation of proceeds of crime and criminals’ proceeds from a holistic perspective. The findings of the paper are based on a literature review along with a legal analysis of the existent legal frameworks. Findings It is suggested that the efficiency of asset confiscation should be looked at from a holistic perspective involving the entire confiscation process, and not only focus on the confiscation powers awarded to the courts. Challenges relating to efficiency exist along the entire process, from the stage of financial investigations to the enforcement stage. Some of the methods used for confiscating criminal proceeds are becoming very far-reaching and raise concerns related to basic principles of criminal law and criminal procedural law. Research limitations/implications This paper is not based on empirical research relating to, for example, the efficiency of confiscation. More empirical research would, however, be welcome in this field. Practical implications The paper suggests that the efficiency of asset confiscation is contingent on the entire confiscation chain functioning efficiently. Before new and more repressive measures are introduced, the existing legal framework should be fully deployed and the concrete needs for new tools clearly delineated. Originality/value The paper analyses confiscation with a view to the entire chain rather than merely looking at a particular confiscation scheme.

Adapting confiscation and anti-money laundering laws to the digital economy: exploring the Australian interplay between proceeds and technology

“…The process of confiscation is said to occur in five phases, all of which require effective and efficient implementation (Boucht, 2019):…”

Islamic Criminal Law Study on The Seizure of Corruptor Assets as an Indonesian's Criminal Sanction in The Future

“…Asset's confiscation of corruptor in Europe, facing difficult and complex procedure, as mentioned by Johan Boucht on his paper, Asset Confiscation In Europe -Past, Present, And Future Challenges Islamic Criminal Law Study on The Seizure of Corruptor Assets as an Indonesian's Criminal Sanction in The Future ║151 (Boucht, 2019). In another hand, Stoyan Panov on his paper Pecunia non olet?…”

Confiscation of proceeds of crime in Vietnam: improving the legal framework

“…The reasons for the low level of confiscation are complex and may differ from country to country. For effective confiscation each phase of identification and tracing of proceeds of crime, the freezing and confiscation of assets as well as their liquidation and distribution must be effective and efficient (Boucht, 2019, p. 534). This requires dedicated, trained staff and efficient process management and adequate powers.…”

“…Boucht divides these in the investigative phase; the preservation of assets phase; obtaining a court order to confiscate the relevant; executing the confiscation order; and disposing of confiscated assets. (Boucht, 2019, p. 527). Each phase has its own role in the confiscation regime and for the regime to be effective, each phase must function efficiently.…”