2016
DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cow004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessments at multiple levels of biological organization allow for an integrative determination of physiological tolerances to turbidity in an endangered fish species

Abstract: This study evaluates turbidity requirements of an endangered fish species using physiological endpoints at multiple levels of biological organization, in particular whole body cortisol, molecular biomarkers, survival, and feeding response. The importance of turbidity and the need for an understanding of the mechanistic behind the observed physiological response are highlighted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(146 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For reference, Vinagre et al [ 38 ] found that a 1°C increase in water temperature increased the gastric evacuation rate of juvenile Solea senegalensis by ~12% between 14 and 20°C. In terms of turbidity, Delta Smelt exhibit an optimal feeding rate between 25 and 80 NTU [ 65 ] and mean turbidity in both freshwater and brackish habitats both fell within this range (31.8 and 40.6 NTU in fresh and brackish water). Similarly, Baskerville-Bridges et al [ 66 ] found that Delta Smelt were ineffective predators in clear water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For reference, Vinagre et al [ 38 ] found that a 1°C increase in water temperature increased the gastric evacuation rate of juvenile Solea senegalensis by ~12% between 14 and 20°C. In terms of turbidity, Delta Smelt exhibit an optimal feeding rate between 25 and 80 NTU [ 65 ] and mean turbidity in both freshwater and brackish habitats both fell within this range (31.8 and 40.6 NTU in fresh and brackish water). Similarly, Baskerville-Bridges et al [ 66 ] found that Delta Smelt were ineffective predators in clear water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Hasenbein et al. , ). Lower abundance of Delta Smelt in clear water than in turbid water may occur because they avoid clear water or are eaten by predators in clear water (Feyrer et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Turbidity also was not included in the model, although it explained 21% (in summer) or 13% (in autumn) of the deviance in log catch per trawl in two long-term surveys Nobriga et al 2008). Young Delta Smelt that are held in clear water show evidence of physiological stress and will not feed readily, suggesting that low turbidity may limit larval feeding success in the estuary (Baskerville-Bridges et al 2004;Hasenbein et al 2013Hasenbein et al , 2016. Lower abundance of Delta Smelt in clear water than in turbid water may occur because they avoid clear water or are eaten by predators in clear water Nobriga et al 2008).…”
Section: What Is Not In the Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Late larval to juvenile Delta Smelt are more abundant in turbid than in clear water, which has been attributed to reduced predation risk and consequent increase in foraging ability (Feyrer et al 2007;Nobriga et al 2008). Stress responses at high and low turbidity reduced the feeding rate of larval Delta Smelt fed Artemia in the laboratory (Hasenbein et al 2016). The variation in demersal behavior of P. forbesi with turbidity may also contribute to better feeding success of Delta Smelt in turbid than in clear water.…”
Section: Feeding Environment Of Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%