1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00167058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessments and decisions in Metellina segmentata (Araneae: Metidae): evidence of a pheromone involved in mate guarding

Abstract: Assessments and decision-making underlying the initiation of mate guarding in a common web-building spider, Metellina segmentata, are examined in a series of field and laboratory studies. Adult males do not build webs but wander in search of females and mating opportunities. Adult males then wait at the edge of the webs of females and guard them prior to courtship and mating. Guarded females were heavier, larger and carried more mature eggs than solitary females. An active process of information gathering is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bukowski, and L. Avilés, in preparation). These laboratory and field observations suggest that females may emit an agerelated sexual signal which attracts males and elicits courtship, as is known in other spiders (Suter and Renkes 1982;Prenter et al 1994). Consistent with this suggestion, we have found that the number of male and female pairs introduced in the laboratory on any given night of staged encounters was highly correlated with the percentage of courting males, as would be the case if an airborne pheromone stimulated courtship (T.C.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Bukowski, and L. Avilés, in preparation). These laboratory and field observations suggest that females may emit an agerelated sexual signal which attracts males and elicits courtship, as is known in other spiders (Suter and Renkes 1982;Prenter et al 1994). Consistent with this suggestion, we have found that the number of male and female pairs introduced in the laboratory on any given night of staged encounters was highly correlated with the percentage of courting males, as would be the case if an airborne pheromone stimulated courtship (T.C.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…An alternative explanation is that males were choosing larger and/or less hungry females (Thornhill 1976, Lawrence 1992). There exists evidence that males prefer larger or better‐fed females in mantids (Lawrence 1992, Maxwell 1998, 1999) and in a spider (Prenter et al 1994), but there is counter‐evidence in another spider (Riechert and Singer 1995). Sexual cannibalism and male choice are not mutually exclusive hypotheses to explain the pattern of male‐female cohabitation that we observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on spider pheromones are on female substances that function in the context of male attraction, in triggering courtship behaviour, and in species recognition . In Metellina segmentata (Tetragnathidae), the assessment of female quality (size and hence fecundity, as well as her nearness to moult) by males seems to be based on pheromonal cues (Prenter, Elwood & Montgomery, 1994). Sexual selection more probably acts on male signals, but male spider pheromones have barely been studied (Ross & Smith, 1979 ;Ayyagari & Tietjen, 1986).…”
Section: Female Choice and Male Competition : The Communicatory Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Tetragnatha elongata, males prefer heavier females and females with higher body condition indices, traits that are correlated with the volume of her egg load and the proximity of oviposition (Danielson-François, Fetterer & Smallwood, 2002). In Metellina segmentata, males assess female quality (size and nearness to moult) before deciding on whether to guard or leave the female (Prenter et al, 1994). In the congeneric M. mengei, the guarding male adjusts his fight tactics against intruders according to the reproductive value of the female, increasing fight intensity and duration with his mate's body mass (Bridge, Elwood & Dick, 2000).…”
Section: Male Mate Choicementioning
confidence: 99%