2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment protocol and effects of two dynamic light patterns on human well-being and performance in a simulated and operational office environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig 4A clearly shows that the bright light was evaluated as more comfortable than the dim light by some participants, but less comfortable by others. In contrast, the effect of CCT on ComfortV showed no statistically significant interindividual differences in responsiveness (χ 2 (2) = .26, p=.88). Fig 4B indicates that the difference in CCT of the light conditions led to comparable changes in visual comfort evaluations for all participants; the warm light conditions were, on average, experienced as more comfortable (1.27 ± .10) compared to the cool light conditions (.92 ± .10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fig 4A clearly shows that the bright light was evaluated as more comfortable than the dim light by some participants, but less comfortable by others. In contrast, the effect of CCT on ComfortV showed no statistically significant interindividual differences in responsiveness (χ 2 (2) = .26, p=.88). Fig 4B indicates that the difference in CCT of the light conditions led to comparable changes in visual comfort evaluations for all participants; the warm light conditions were, on average, experienced as more comfortable (1.27 ± .10) compared to the cool light conditions (.92 ± .10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For visual comfort, there was a statistically significant main effect of CCT (Fig 3D; F(1,44) = 13.42, p=.001), but not of Illuminance . However, the effect of Illuminance on Comfort V was structurally influenced by interindividual differences (χ 2 (2) = 18.82, p<.001); the illuminance of the light led to widely varying visual comfort votes by the participants (range = - .50 to 1.57). Fig 4A clearly shows that the bright light was evaluated as more comfortable than the dim light by some participants, but less comfortable by others.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the aspect of energy saving, ergonomic considerations in lighting are becoming increasingly important. Modern, multi-channel LED systems offer a huge flexibility in providing dynamic patterns of light exposure throughout the day [ 20 ], which can be tailored to match the users’ specific needs in terms of circadian rhythm [ 21 , 22 , 23 ], task-related performance [ 20 , 24 , 25 ], and lighting preference [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. With regard to an intelligent lighting control, sensor feedback may thus allow for an automated time- and task-dependent adaptation of corresponding light levels and spectra, while taking contributions from time-varying natural daylight sources into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little research has explored user experience of tunable, dimmable LED lighting systems of these varied lighting designs (Perumal et al, 2021). Aires et al applied tunable lighting in a controlled laboratory and a quasi-controlled field environment, finding inconsistent and inconclusive results between the two environments, with the authors suggesting testing lighting patterns in the field before implementing in a real environment (Aries et al, 2020). The acceptability of lighting technologies is contingent on user assessments of the light quality within specific environmental applications ( Assessment of Solid-State Lighting , 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%