2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of water security in the large watersheds of Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main purpose of this research based on the positivism paradigm included measuring agricultural water security at the international and national levels, testing water security hypotheses and factors affecting it (with the aim of predicting water security), identifying real water security threats and controlling these threats (Malekian et al, 2017). For example, in order to evaluate the water security in Iran and its large watersheds over a period of 20 years at intervals of 5 years, Zakeri et al (2022) introduced eight indices affecting water security. These indices included per capita renewable water resources, water intensity, water efficiency, investment in water infrastructures, water quality, access to freshwater and pollution management, changes in green cover levels and large-scale changes to minimize the water security.…”
Section: The Perspectives Of Positivism and Constructivism Paradigms ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose of this research based on the positivism paradigm included measuring agricultural water security at the international and national levels, testing water security hypotheses and factors affecting it (with the aim of predicting water security), identifying real water security threats and controlling these threats (Malekian et al, 2017). For example, in order to evaluate the water security in Iran and its large watersheds over a period of 20 years at intervals of 5 years, Zakeri et al (2022) introduced eight indices affecting water security. These indices included per capita renewable water resources, water intensity, water efficiency, investment in water infrastructures, water quality, access to freshwater and pollution management, changes in green cover levels and large-scale changes to minimize the water security.…”
Section: The Perspectives Of Positivism and Constructivism Paradigms ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aalirezaei et al (2021) used gray management analysis, GM (1,1), to identify and forecast water security level, and the results are presented for a time-series analysis of the key performance indicators for a water security unit in Saskatchewan, Canada. Ali Zakeri et al (2022) selected 8 indicators to evaluate the water security in Iran and its large watersheds over a period of 20 years based on the analytical network process (ANP) method. Aboelnga et al (2020) developed a new urban water security assessment framework and applied the new assessment framework on the city of Madaba, Jordan, and measured urban water security using the integrated urban water security index and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially viewed as a water scarcity issue, the concept of water security has evolved over time and is now looked at holistically, encompassing several dimensions (Cook & Bakker, 2012;Chapagain et al, 2022). A widely accepted definition of water security provided by UN-Water (2013) Water security assessment has received increasing attention from academicians, practitioners, planners, and policy-and decisionmakers, with varieties of frameworks developed for different scales (Sullivan, 2002;Vörösmarty et al, 2010;Grey & Sadoff, 2007;Cook & Bakker, 2012;van Leeuwen & Chandy, 2013;UN-Water, 2013;Gerlak et al, 2018;Assefa, Babel, Sušnik, & Shinde, 2018;Krueger, Rao, & Borchardt, 2019;Jensen & Wu, 2018;Aboelnga, Ribbe, Frechen, & Saghir, 2019;Young et al, 2019;Chang & Zhu, 2020;Babel, Shinde, Sharma, & Dang, 2020;Khan, Guan, Khan, & Khan, 2020;Chang & Zhu, 2021;Zakeri, Mirnia, & Moradi, 2022;Chapagain et al, 2022;Babel et al, 2022;GWP, 2000;ADB, 2013ADB, , 2016WEF, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%