2014
DOI: 10.1109/tdei.2014.6832274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of water content in an impregnated pressboard based on DC conductivity measurements theoretical assumptions

Abstract: The paper presents results of investigations of the effect of moisture content and temperature on DC conductivity of the impregnated pressboard. It has been found that the conductivity of the impregnated pressboard is a function of activation energy, moisture content and temperature. It has been found that moisture content ranging from 1.4% to 6.4% do not cause any changes in the conductivity activation energy whose value is ∆W av = (0.853 0.071) eV. On the other hand water content strongly influences the valu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…References [23,24] have pointed out that the activation energy of oil-impregnated paper is 0.8~0.9 eV. By data fitting, we obtained that u a = 0.84 eV, which was consistent with the literature.…”
Section: Electro-thermal Breakdown Simulationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…References [23,24] have pointed out that the activation energy of oil-impregnated paper is 0.8~0.9 eV. By data fitting, we obtained that u a = 0.84 eV, which was consistent with the literature.…”
Section: Electro-thermal Breakdown Simulationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the paper by _ Zukowski et al (2014) it has been found that conduction in a moist oil-impregnated pressboard is realized as a hopping exchange of electrons (tunneling) and is determined by the presence of water molecules there. In the papers ( _ Zukowski et al 2014( _ Zukowski et al , 2015a it was found that in a composite of cellulose, mineral oil, and water nanoparticles, the conductivity results from electron tunneling between potential wells formed by nanodrops of water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the papers ( _ Zukowski et al 2014( _ Zukowski et al , 2015a it was found that in a composite of cellulose, mineral oil, and water nanoparticles, the conductivity results from electron tunneling between potential wells formed by nanodrops of water. The well, from which the electron hops, gets positively charged, while the well into which the electron hops obtains the negative charge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 7.11, for mineral oil and 164 | P a g e NE impregnated pressboard insulation, the activation energies found are 0.90 eV and 0.91 eV respectively and they show a good match with the values given in [124,253]. On the other hand, synthetic ester impregnated pressboard insulation possesses activation energy of 0.79 eV indicating its less temperature dependence behaviour.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Here we hypothesise that the effect of mobile charge density is dominant when a sample contains low moisture level and thereby, effective DC conductivity of ester impregnated pressboard should be higher than that of mineral oil impregnated pressboard. We propose that the number of charge transport paths across a sample is solely determined by the concentration of water and moreover, charge mobility is inversely proportional to the distance between water molecules [253]. Thus, DC conductivity for all type of oil impregnated pressboard insulation with higher moisture level should be in a similar range.…”
Section: Through Modelling Of Fds Datamentioning
confidence: 99%