Cutting-Edge Research in Agricultural Sciences Vol. 10 2021
DOI: 10.9734/bpi/cras/v10/8037d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Variation in Agronomical Traits among Herbicide Tolerant M3 and M4 Maize Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implied that an increase in tolerance, led to a lowered grain yield plant -1 . Williams et al (2014) reported similar results for herbicide tolerance with grain yield while Kariuki et al (2016) reported significant negative correlation for grain yield plant -1 in maize.…”
Section: Correlation Of Yield and Herbicide Tolerance With Other Agro...mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This implied that an increase in tolerance, led to a lowered grain yield plant -1 . Williams et al (2014) reported similar results for herbicide tolerance with grain yield while Kariuki et al (2016) reported significant negative correlation for grain yield plant -1 in maize.…”
Section: Correlation Of Yield and Herbicide Tolerance With Other Agro...mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…(Kumar et al, 2015;Shrestha, 2016;Kandel et al, 2017 andKandel et al, 2018) also found differences significantly in maize hybrids for the studied traits. Range of variability reported in literature were: from 116.13 to 234.53 cm for plant height (Ali, 2014;Khan et al, 2017 andRamzan, 2018), from 33.65 to 102.43 cm for ear height (Izzam et al, 2017;Khan et al 2017 andRamzan, 2018), from 13.1 to 20.73 cm for ear length (Kariuki et al 2017;Izzam et al, 2017 andKhan et al, 2017). from 1.00 to 2.60 for ears per plant Khan et al, 2017 andRamzan, 2018) from 46.2 to 145.9 (g) for cob weight Ghimire et al, 2015;Rahman et al, 2017 andHassan et al, 2018) from 218.4 to 576.4 for kernels per ear (Khan et al 2018 andRamzan, 2018), from 12.00 to 16.00 for kernel rows per cob Izzam et al, 2017 andRamzan, 2018), from 15.20 to 39.80 for kernels per row (Ullah et al,2016 andKariuki et al, 2017), from 18.35 to 40.78 (g) for 100 grains weight (Turi et al, 2007;Izzam et al, 2017 andRamzan, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…from 1.00 to 2.60 for ears per plant Khan et al, 2017 andRamzan, 2018) from 46.2 to 145.9 (g) for cob weight Ghimire et al, 2015;Rahman et al, 2017 andHassan et al, 2018) from 218.4 to 576.4 for kernels per ear (Khan et al 2018 andRamzan, 2018), from 12.00 to 16.00 for kernel rows per cob Izzam et al, 2017 andRamzan, 2018), from 15.20 to 39.80 for kernels per row (Ullah et al,2016 andKariuki et al, 2017), from 18.35 to 40.78 (g) for 100 grains weight (Turi et al, 2007;Izzam et al, 2017 andRamzan, 2018). From 41.19 (g) to 170.55 (g) for grain yield per plant (Kariuki et al 2017 andRamzan, 2018). In present study the ranges of the observed traits kernels per cob, plant height, number of ears, ear height, kernels rows per cob,100 grains weight and grains yield per plant were quite low from the ranges recorded in the literature, these characters can therefore be relied upon and simple selection could be carried out for additional improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%