Assessment of Undernutrition Among Children in 55 Low- and Middle-Income Countries Using Dietary and Anthropometric Measures

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Evidence on the suitability of anthropometric failure (ie, stunting, underweight, and wasting) as a stand-alone measure of child undernutrition can inform global and national nutrition and health agendas. OBJECTIVE To provide a comprehensive estimate of the prevalence of child undernutrition by evaluating both dietary and anthropometric measures simultaneously across 55 low-and middleincome countries. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a cross-sectional study that used Demographic and Health Surveys program data from July 2009 to January 2019, to allocate children into dietary and anthropometric failure categories. Nationally representative household surveys were conducted in 55 low-and middle-income countries. Participants included children aged 6 to 23 months who were born singleton and had valid anthropometric measures as well as available 24-hour food intake recollection. Data analysis was conducted from August 23 to October 22, 2020. EXPOSURES Two factors were considered to allocate children into the respective categories. Dietary failure was based on the World Health Organization standards for minimum dietary diversity. Anthropometric failure was constructed using the World Health Organization child growth reference standard z score for stunted growth, muscle wasting, and less than average weight for age. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Dietary and anthropometric failures were cross-tabulated, which yielded 4 potential outcomes: dietary failure only, anthropometric failure only, both failures, and neither failure. Total child populations for each category were extrapolated from United Nations population estimates. RESULTS Of the 162 589 children (median age [range], 14 months [6-23 months]; 83 467 boys [51.3%]; 78 894 Asian children [48.5%]) in our sample, 42.9% of children had dietary failure according to the standard World Health Organization definition without being identified as having anthropometric failures. In all, 34.7% had both failures, 42.9% had dietary failure only, 8.3% had anthropometric failure only, and 14.1% had neither failure. Dietary and anthropometric measures were discordant for 51.2% of children; these children had nutritional needs identified by only 1 of the 2 measures. Dietary failure doubled the proportion of children in need of dietary interventions compared with anthropometry alone (43%). A total of 45.3 million additional children who experienced undernutrition in these 55 countries were not captured through the evaluation of anthropometric failures only. These results were consistent across geographic regions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that the current standard of measuring child undernutrition by estimating the prevalence of anthropometric failure (continued) Key Points Question Is anthropometric failure an adequate stand-alone measure to estimate global child undernutrition, and how do estimates change when dietary measures are also taken into account? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 162 589 children (...

Differences in wasting assessment through Middle‐Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) adjusted by sex, age and geographic origin for children aged 6–59 months: New reference based on anthropometric surveys from 22 low‐and‐middle‐income countries

“…As the main limitation of the study, it should be noted that not all countries are equally represented, being Tajikistan and Angola the countries most affected by this phenomenon, but which we have decided to keep in order to enable the use and application of the results obtained in our research in those countries. Other similar research analyzing the childhood anthropometry in low and middle-income countries pooling data from national and regional health surveys also show a significant disparity in sample sizes and includes countries with a total number of children even smaller than those of the present study (Heemann et al, 2021). This is explained by the origin of the data coming from anthropometric assessments linked to humanitarian assistance programs.…”

Development and validation of a point‐of‐care nursing mobile tool to guide the diagnosis of malnutrition in hospitalized adult patients: a multicenter, prospective cohort study

“…In the field of screening malnutrition, more and more mobile phone interventions were developed 39,40 . These studies helped to screen malnutrition especially in low‐ and middle‐income countries, but were also limited by low network capacity and limited access to mobile phones to specific technical barriers 41–43 . Malnutrition screening is a very important link in inpatients with various disease to improve their outcomes 44 .…”

“… 39 , 40 These studies helped to screen malnutrition especially in low‐ and middle‐income countries, but were also limited by low network capacity and limited access to mobile phones to specific technical barriers. 41 , 42 , 43 Malnutrition screening is a very important link in inpatients with various disease to improve their outcomes. 44 Since the malnutrition due to various diseases has a certain performance on the patient's face, we developed and validated a malnutrition screening tool for multiple diseases.…”

Transcranial doppler velocities in a large healthy population of African children

“…One limitation of our study is that we screened participants for moderate to severe malnutrition based on the MUAC. However, while excellent at determining significant malnutrition, passing an anthropometric measure such as the MUAC does not ensure adequate dietary intake or good overall nutritional status [ 25 ]. Thus, we remain unclear if undernutrition contributed to our findings.…”