2001
DOI: 10.2172/789923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Unabated Facility Emission Potentials for Evaluating Airborne Radionuclide Monitoring Requirements at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory - 2001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…continuously sampled. Results of the 1992-1993 assessment were documented by Sula and Jette (1994) with updates in 1995, 1999, and 2001. This report documents the most recent m and assessments for 200 2.1…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…continuously sampled. Results of the 1992-1993 assessment were documented by Sula and Jette (1994) with updates in 1995, 1999, and 2001. This report documents the most recent m and assessments for 200 2.1…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The three story building (see Figure 1) has over 140,000 total square feet with over 100 offices, more than 70 individual laboratories, and specialized areas such as high bays, hot cells, shops, and waste treatment operations. (Ballinger et. al., 2001).…”
Section: The 325 Radiochemical Processing Laboratory (Rpl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system is compliant with ANSI N13.1 -1969. More details on the facility and sampling system can be obtained from the Facility Effluent Monitoring Plan for the 325 Radiochemical Processing Laboratory(Ballinger 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential for emissions from PNNL facilities is assessed annually to verify sampling requirements. The methodology used to evaluate the potential for emissions is documented in PNL-10855, Assessment of Unabated Facility Emission Potentials for Evaluating Airborne Radionuclide Monitoring Requirements at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (Ballinger et al 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%