2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of turbulence models for the boundary layer transition flow simulation around a hydrofoil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ANSYS CFX are used for numerical simulations of the flow fields, and the classical SST k-ω turbulence model with the γ -Re θ t transition model is employed. There are many novel CFD models for the foils (Ghalandari et al, 2019;Salih et al, 2019), but this classical modelling scheme is popular for turbulent flow computations in hydro-energy machinery, and its reliability has been demonstrated in the previous studies of the authors (Ye et al, 2020;Zeng et al, 2019).…”
Section: Vandv Of Numerical Simulation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANSYS CFX are used for numerical simulations of the flow fields, and the classical SST k-ω turbulence model with the γ -Re θ t transition model is employed. There are many novel CFD models for the foils (Ghalandari et al, 2019;Salih et al, 2019), but this classical modelling scheme is popular for turbulent flow computations in hydro-energy machinery, and its reliability has been demonstrated in the previous studies of the authors (Ye et al, 2020;Zeng et al, 2019).…”
Section: Vandv Of Numerical Simulation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, DNS is the most accurate approach that directly solves the N-S equation, and in [10], the laminar separation bubble on the NACA66 hydrofoil with Reynolds number of 45,000 and angle of attack (AoA) = 4 • was predicted. Well resolved Large Eddy Simulation (LES) can be used to predict laminar separation as well and reported in several studies, including [15], in which LES predicted laminar separation was compared with several different approaches. However, DNS and resolved LES are too computationally expensive for most engineering approaches, especially where the focus is on cases with Reynolds numbers around 1 × 10 6 and complex geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition sensitive turbulence model seems to be capable in predicting natural transition, bypass transition and separation induced transition in the framework of a RANS turbulence model. Especially, the prediction of separation induced transition is claimed to be a 'major advantage' of the model [18], and the locations of laminar separation are well predicted compared with advanced approaches [15]. The fundamental correlation of the transition model is the linking of scaled ratio of vorticity Reynolds number, Re v = ρy 2 µ S, and momentum thickness Reynolds number, Re θ , with the boundary layer shape factor H, as max(Re y ) 2.193Re θ ∼ H. Separation induced transition is triggered by the parameter γ sep , which is calculated similarly as max(Re y )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the model cannot be used to simulate the laminar-to-turbulent transition of a boundary layer based on the local variables of the flow field. Thus, it has obvious limitations in the prediction of the hydrofoil boundary layer transition [4] . For the prediction of the transition, Menter et al [5] proposed the shear stress transfer (SST)t Re   transition model based on the local variables by introducing the transport equations for the intermittency factor  and the momentum thickness Reynolds number Re  and setting a critical value t Re  at the transition.…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the transition model shear stress transfer curvature correction (SSTCC)t Re   , the curvature correction influences the prediction in the near-wall region and the wake region of the NACA0009 hydrofoil as compared with the SST t Re   model. However, the flow fields calculated by different correction coefficients are quite different and it is difficult to balance the accuracy of the wake and boundary layer predictions [4] . Therefore, it is desirable to develop a new empirical correlation function based on the original SSTt Re   model for simulating the flows along a curved hydrofoil.…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%