2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10862-005-0633-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Trichotillomania: A Psychometric Evaluation of Hair-Pulling Scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
98
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
98
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of assessment is to determine a diagnosis and acquire information to assist in developing the treatment plan (Diefenbach, Tolin, Crocetto, Maltby, & Hannan, 2005). Before treatment can be implemented it is necessary to assure that hair pulling is the behavior that the client wishes to address in counseling (Mansueto, Golomb, Thomas, & Stemberger, 1999).…”
Section: Behavioral Assessment Of Trichotillomaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The goal of assessment is to determine a diagnosis and acquire information to assist in developing the treatment plan (Diefenbach, Tolin, Crocetto, Maltby, & Hannan, 2005). Before treatment can be implemented it is necessary to assure that hair pulling is the behavior that the client wishes to address in counseling (Mansueto, Golomb, Thomas, & Stemberger, 1999).…”
Section: Behavioral Assessment Of Trichotillomaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MGH Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS) is a self-report instrument that provides information concerning the frequency, intensity, associated stress and attempts to control behaviors connected with Trichotillomania (Diefenbach et al, 2005;Twohig & Woods, 2004). The Psychiatric Institute Trichotillomania Scale (PITS) is a clinician rated assessment tool that assesses multiple features of hair pulling.…”
Section: Behavioral Assessment Of Trichotillomaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A self-report measure, the Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS) [14] has demonstrated good psychometric properties in adult samples [14,15], although correlations with global clinician ratings are low [16]. Furthermore, the language in the MGH-HPS might not be appropriate for younger children, TTM severity is represented by a single score rather than by specific factors, and there is no means of assessing parents' perceptions of TTM severity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%