2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-04930-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of trapped powder removal and inspection strategies for powder bed fusion techniques

Abstract: The issue of trapped powder within a part made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (AM) is one of the 'dirty secrets' of AM, yet it has not received significant attention by the research community. Trapped powders limit the application of AM for complex geometries, including heat exchangers and dies with conformal cooling channels. Being able to detect and remove trapped powder from the build is a necessary step to avoid downstream processing and performance challenges. In this work, 'powder challen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hunter, L.W. [51] reported on the inability to assemble functional parts due to the presence of trapped powder within a part made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing that was not, up to now, researched enough by the scientific community, especially regarding the parts with complex surfaces and inner channels. By the opinion of the authors, the problem of trapped raw powder granules limits the application of additive manufacturing methods for complex geometries like heat exchangers and dies with conformal cooling channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hunter, L.W. [51] reported on the inability to assemble functional parts due to the presence of trapped powder within a part made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing that was not, up to now, researched enough by the scientific community, especially regarding the parts with complex surfaces and inner channels. By the opinion of the authors, the problem of trapped raw powder granules limits the application of additive manufacturing methods for complex geometries like heat exchangers and dies with conformal cooling channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially when the implant is fabricated with EBM, the complete removal of the metal powder from small pores of the implants during the manufacturing process is extremely difficult due to pre-heating or the partial consolidation of the powder. 16,25 We therefore developed a new type of porous Ti-6Al-4V implant with relatively large, lattice-shaped, interconnected pores of 880–1400 μm. This porous implant allows for the easy removal of metal powder from pores with currently available removal techniques, such as manual processes, liquid immersion, and ultrasonic cleaning, 25 owing to its relatively large geometric pattern of pores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,25 We therefore developed a new type of porous Ti-6Al-4V implant with relatively large, lattice-shaped, interconnected pores of 880–1400 μm. This porous implant allows for the easy removal of metal powder from pores with currently available removal techniques, such as manual processes, liquid immersion, and ultrasonic cleaning, 25 owing to its relatively large geometric pattern of pores. Furthermore, if enough bone ingrowth is observed in the implant with a lager pore size, then a stronger bonding between metal and bone can be expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Archimedes method [8] has been used in different studies to evaluate the relative density of parts [9,10]. In L-PBF processing, due to the geometrical constraints and/or partial consolidation of powder particles, there might be particles left inside of pores after build completion [11]. Since the used immersion liquid cannot wet rough surfaces efficiently and also does not take these internally trapped powders into consideration, the Archimedes method is not a very reliable technique to precisely measure the porosity content in L-PBF samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%