2015
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rru116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of transposed ovarian movement: how much of a safety margin should be added during pelvic radiotherapy?

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to analyze transposed ovarian movement. Data from 27 patients who underwent ovarian transposition after surgical treatment for uterine cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Computed tomography (CT) images including transposed ovaries were superimposed on other CT images acquired at different times, and were matched on bony structures. Differences in ovarian position between the CT images were measured. The planning organ at risk volume (PRV) margins were calculated from the formul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The international commission on radiation units and measurements (ICRU) recommends that planning organ at risk volume (PRV) margins should be used, because uncertainties and variations in the positioning of the organ at risk (OAR) during treatment must be considered to avoid serious complications [20]. A recent study proposed that the PRV margin for transposed ovaries is ~ 2 cm in all directions [21]; however, 2 cm margins would be excessively large in many cases. When the patient is younger, and the preservation of ovarian function is required, should the dose constraint of the ovarian PRV be considered as a priority, and what is the adequate dose constraint to transported ovaries?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The international commission on radiation units and measurements (ICRU) recommends that planning organ at risk volume (PRV) margins should be used, because uncertainties and variations in the positioning of the organ at risk (OAR) during treatment must be considered to avoid serious complications [20]. A recent study proposed that the PRV margin for transposed ovaries is ~ 2 cm in all directions [21]; however, 2 cm margins would be excessively large in many cases. When the patient is younger, and the preservation of ovarian function is required, should the dose constraint of the ovarian PRV be considered as a priority, and what is the adequate dose constraint to transported ovaries?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ovary should lie at least 2 cm above the iliac crest [ 48 ]. In addition, a safety margin of approximately 2 cm must be included, because the position of the ovaries can change postoperatively [ 49 ].…”
Section: Ovarian Transpositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 If IMRT is implemented, the planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV) margin is 2 cm in all directions. 38 Given the risk for ovarian migration, OT should be performed as close to the time of RT as possible. 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%