2015
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/11338.5771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Tooth Proportions in an Aesthetically Acceptable Smile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with many other authors who confirmed gender variations in the dimensions of the anterior teeth, with men exhibiting wider anterior teeth than women. (9,13) The results in the present study for W/L ratio of anterior teeth in a sample of Egyptian population were 86% for the CI, 78% for the LI and 82% for the C. These results were in agreement with Sterrett et al 1999, (7) and Orozco-Varo et al 2015, except for W/L of canine was of lesser value (79%) than this study. The present results were also similar to Zlataric et al 2007, (14) (in a Caucasian population) except for W/L ratio of CI was of lesser value (83%), and also similar to Zagar 2011, (15) (4) was akin to the present result, who found that 0 mm of gingival display was the most attractive, which is in agreement with the dentist perception in our study, and that 3 mm of gingival display had the lowest score for attractiveness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are in agreement with many other authors who confirmed gender variations in the dimensions of the anterior teeth, with men exhibiting wider anterior teeth than women. (9,13) The results in the present study for W/L ratio of anterior teeth in a sample of Egyptian population were 86% for the CI, 78% for the LI and 82% for the C. These results were in agreement with Sterrett et al 1999, (7) and Orozco-Varo et al 2015, except for W/L of canine was of lesser value (79%) than this study. The present results were also similar to Zlataric et al 2007, (14) (in a Caucasian population) except for W/L ratio of CI was of lesser value (83%), and also similar to Zagar 2011, (15) (4) was akin to the present result, who found that 0 mm of gingival display was the most attractive, which is in agreement with the dentist perception in our study, and that 3 mm of gingival display had the lowest score for attractiveness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This technique following the method used by other authors. Hasanreisoglu et al 2005, (10) used a specially designed stabilizer device resembling a face bow, whereas Jain et al 2015, (13) used a customized cephalostat. The results of current study indicate that anterior teeth dimensions vary by gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second phase of study selection, full‐text analysis was performed for 77 articles, resulting in 23 meeting the inclusion criteria and was, therefore, included in this systematic review (Figure 2). This review of the literature is based on 23 articles published from March 20, 2010, to July 25, 2019 2,8,9,17,18,20,21,25‐34 . In all, data from 3603 participants were recorded.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the different classifications included were the groups comparable, were cases and controls matched appropriately, were the same criteria used for identification of cases and controls, was exposure measured in a standard, valid, and reliable way, was exposure measured in the same way for cases and controls, and were confounding factors identified (Table 1, Figure 3). 8,9,17,18,20,21,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] In all, data from 3603 participants were recorded. Data collected was reported from each study.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Europe 3 and India. 10 This situation represents a shift of the standards of beauty commonly used in the teaching of dental aesthetics applied to a population of Caucasian origin, which does not coincide with the morphological aspects of the population living in South America, due to the high population variability in this region caused by migratory inf lux.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%