2021
DOI: 10.32677/ijch.2021.v08.i06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of thyroid hormones in full-term neonates with late-onset sepsis

Abstract: Neonatal sepsis is a clinical syndrome characterized by signs and symptoms of infection with or without bacteremia in neonatal age. The incidence of neonatal sepsis in India is 38 per 1000 live births according to the data obtained from the National Neonatal Perinatal Database [1]. It is classified into two types depending on the time of onset of symptoms: Early onset of sepsis (EOS) which presents within the first 72 h of life and late onset of sepsis (LOS) that occurs after 72 h of life [2].Many neuroendocri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, medications widely used in PICU could be incriminated. We found that NTIS frequency in septic shock group was nearly double that of the sepsis (65% versus 30%) which was in accordance with results obtained by previous studies that reported thyroid hormone levels were significantly lower in children with septic shock, compared to sepsis [27][28][29]. Also, NTIS was more prevalent among non-survivors than survivors; however, the values did not reach level of significance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, medications widely used in PICU could be incriminated. We found that NTIS frequency in septic shock group was nearly double that of the sepsis (65% versus 30%) which was in accordance with results obtained by previous studies that reported thyroid hormone levels were significantly lower in children with septic shock, compared to sepsis [27][28][29]. Also, NTIS was more prevalent among non-survivors than survivors; however, the values did not reach level of significance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%