2017
DOI: 10.18182/tjf.294916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the visual landscape quality based on the subjectivist paradigm to design the memorial garden

Abstract: Assessment of the visual landscape quality is a core part of studies in landscape and urban projects. The landscape visual assessment has been carried out on the basis of two paradigms; objectivist and subjectivist paradigms. This research is a case of landscape evaluation based on the subjectivist or psychological paradigm. The purpose of the research is to understand the beholder's perception of the visual quality of landscape and to use it in the design of a war memorial garden. In this article, three main … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Structure of the study. sign approach) and subjectivist (community perception-based approach), which differ in terms of their specific views on landscapes (Pouya and Behbahani 2017). In the former, the visual quality is considered to be inherent to landscapes and in the latter the quality is in the eye of the beholder (Lothian 1999;De Val et al 2006).…”
Section: Paradigms Of Landscape Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 Structure of the study. sign approach) and subjectivist (community perception-based approach), which differ in terms of their specific views on landscapes (Pouya and Behbahani 2017). In the former, the visual quality is considered to be inherent to landscapes and in the latter the quality is in the eye of the beholder (Lothian 1999;De Val et al 2006).…”
Section: Paradigms Of Landscape Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human aspect is acknowledged in terms of viewpoints, location, number of viewers and sensitivity (Daniel 2001). In contrast, the perception-based approach emphasizes the human view of landscapes (Wu et al 2006) and regards landscape quality as being in the eye of the beholder (Pouya and Behbahani 2017). Various landscape studies using this approach introduce derived perceptual factors of landscape (Daniel 2001) and the emotional responses of people to different landscapes.…”
Section: Paradigms Of Landscape Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Buna karşılık psikolojik (sübjektivist) modelde, kapsamı açıklanmış peyzaj özellikleri, estetik ölçütlerce -alanında uzman kişilerle-analiz edilmek yerine; halkın psikolojik, sosyal ve kültürel altyapısına bağlı olarak değişen tercihlerin istatistiksel yöntemlerle değerlendirilmesini kapsamaktadır. Fiziksel (objektivist-uzman) modelin, toplumun istek, ihtiyaç ve tercihlerini doğrudan yansıtma konusunda yetersiz kalması nedeniyle psikolojik (sübjektivist) modele göre daha az güvenilir olduğu birçok çalışmada belirtilmiştir (Daniel 2001;Temelli 2008;Tüfekçioğlu 2008;Pouya ve Behbahani 2017). Her iki yaklaşım da peyzaj kalitesinin, peyzajın biyolojik süreci ve gözlemcinin algı yeteneği arasındaki etkileşimden kaynaklandığını kabul etmektedir ancak bu iki yaklaşım arasındaki fark, uzmanların ve kullanıcıların karşılıklı hâkimiyeti olarak görülmektedir.…”
Section: Görsel Kalite Değerlendirme Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılmasıunclassified