2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the standard precipitation frequency estimates in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again the most dramatic growth is seen in SSP5 where the largest growth is expected to occur in areas along the Gulf Coast, Atlantic Coast, and the West US. In regard to the Gulf and Atlantic, this growth intersects directly with the areas most likely to see increased flooding from SLR, intensifying hurricanes, and increases in extreme precipitation (Bates et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2022;Shu et al, 2023). Smaller exposure growth rates are seen in the SSP1 and SSP 2 scenarios due to the more muted growth rates than projected by the innovation/competition driven SSP5 scenario, however, the spatial patterns are relatively consistent.…”
Section: Population Projections and Flood Exposurementioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again the most dramatic growth is seen in SSP5 where the largest growth is expected to occur in areas along the Gulf Coast, Atlantic Coast, and the West US. In regard to the Gulf and Atlantic, this growth intersects directly with the areas most likely to see increased flooding from SLR, intensifying hurricanes, and increases in extreme precipitation (Bates et al, 2021;Kim et al, 2022;Shu et al, 2023). Smaller exposure growth rates are seen in the SSP1 and SSP 2 scenarios due to the more muted growth rates than projected by the innovation/competition driven SSP5 scenario, however, the spatial patterns are relatively consistent.…”
Section: Population Projections and Flood Exposurementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Climate adjusted flood models are early in development within peer-reviewed literature, and are not widely used (Wing et al, 2022). Additionally, most models are unable to estimate risk at a high-resolution (Ward et al, 2013;Alfieri et al, 2017), fail to consider adaptation (Scussolini et al, 2016;Wing et al, 2019), cannot accurately capture extreme precipitation (Kim et al, 2022), and often focus on single flood sources of either pluvial, fluvial, or coastal (Kulp & Strauss, 2019;Marsooli et al, 2019;Wing et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "Stage IV" rainfall data set (Nelson et al (2016)) has an hourly time scale and a spatial resolution of approximately 4 km over the continental US, with a record length that exceeds 20 years. Although the Stage IV data have been used for climatological analyses (e.g., Kim et al (2022)), rainfall estimation errors (see Nelson et al (2016)) seriously limit their utility (see Eldardiry et al (2017) and Post and Krajewski (2023) for discussion of problems that arise for rainfall frequency analyses). Reanalysis data sets developed from archived radar fields and algorithms that can be tailored to specific applications provide another path for climatological analyses of rainfall , Nelson et al (2010), Krajewski et al (2013), J.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Stage IV data have been used for climatological analyses (e.g., Kim et al. (2022)), rainfall estimation errors (see Nelson et al. (2016)) seriously limit their utility (see Eldardiry et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the Atlas 14 precipitation records are losing their representativeness of current conditions almost exclusively due to the non-stationarity of extreme precipitation 8 . Indeed, the non-stationarity of meteorological phenomena over time has been accelerated by global warming, and extreme weather events’ severity and frequency have increased faster than expected 9 , 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%