2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the soil organic carbon stock in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
60
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
7
60
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Even between 1990 and 2008, the sharp increase in internal and external flows of biomass for animal feed barely contributed to increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) due to the fact that these flows had an increasingly lower C:N ratio for the largest proportion of monogastric and ruminant animals, as noted previously [47]. This helps to explain why half of all agricultural land in Spain currently has an organic carbon content of less than 1% [48]. Moreover, the availability of phytomass is necessary to sustain complex food chains of heterotrophic species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Even between 1990 and 2008, the sharp increase in internal and external flows of biomass for animal feed barely contributed to increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) due to the fact that these flows had an increasingly lower C:N ratio for the largest proportion of monogastric and ruminant animals, as noted previously [47]. This helps to explain why half of all agricultural land in Spain currently has an organic carbon content of less than 1% [48]. Moreover, the availability of phytomass is necessary to sustain complex food chains of heterotrophic species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, although this surplus does not affect the quality of the soil, it does negatively affect other fund elements such as water, biodiversity, and the atmosphere. The relatively low values in cropland indicate that agricultural land is on the threshold of degradation (Romanyà et al 2007, Rodríguez-Martín et al 2016. In theory, the increase in cropland NPPact resulting from intensification, together with the massive importation of feed, could have brought about a substantial increase in the return of organic carbon to the soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replenishment of organic carbon: In both ecosystems and agroecosystems, the main driver of SOC is biomass input (Rodríguez-Martín et al 2016). The fundamental difference is that, in agroecosystems, the magnitude of this input is both directly and indirectly conditioned by the farming method: directly, because many farming practices, such as residue burning, organic fertilization, use of herbicides, and so forth, intentionally modify the magnitude of the input; and indirectly, because the NPPact is affected by farming methods, to the extent that it affects the state of the fund elements and/or modifies the availability of limiting factors.…”
Section: Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Liu et al [11] predicted the spatial patterns of soil N and P stocks for the whole Loess Plateau using OK, and total N and P stocks amounted to 0.217 and 0.205 Pg (1 Pg = 10 15 g), respectively. Martín et al [17] predicted the spatial distribution of soil carbon stocks within 0-30 cm with OK across Spain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%