The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2003
DOI: 10.1159/000067957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Single-Occlusion Technique for Measurements of Respiratory Mechanics and Respiratory Drive in Healthy Term Neonates Using a Commercially Available Computerized Pulmonary Function Testing System

Abstract: In this study, a critical assessment of the single-occlusion technique as a means of measuring passive respiratory mechanics and respiratory drive (P0.1) was performed in nonintubated spontaneously breathing healthy term neonates using commercially available computerized equipment (PEDS system). In general, we found that quality parameters only partially conformed to the international established standards for measuring passive respiratory mechanics. There was a failure rate of technically acceptable occlusion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our average estimate of C (0.97 AE 0. 21 As the resistance data are less influenced by the measurement frequencies, our mean R data are close to the previously reported values of Rrs obtained from transfer impedance measurements, 39 with the occlusion technique, 13,15,16 and RL determined from tidal breathing. 5,7,11 No inertance data that could be compared with our results have been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Resistance and Compliancesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our average estimate of C (0.97 AE 0. 21 As the resistance data are less influenced by the measurement frequencies, our mean R data are close to the previously reported values of Rrs obtained from transfer impedance measurements, 39 with the occlusion technique, 13,15,16 and RL determined from tidal breathing. 5,7,11 No inertance data that could be compared with our results have been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Resistance and Compliancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Simple tidal breathing methods, such as inductance plethysmography 17 can reach higher (> 90%) success rates. Only a few studies based on the single-breath occlusion technique 15,34 report success rates, which were as low as 50-55% due to the absence of relaxation, instability of end-expiratory volume (EELV) or expiratory flow braking. With the oscillations superimposed on uninterrupted tidal breathing as in the present study, obvious artefacts, such as glottic closure, apnoeic intervals, noisy breathing and long expirations suggesting a marked flow breaking can be identified in and omitted from the recordings.…”
Section: Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation of compliance and resistance, as well as work of breathing, is usually achieved using any of several traditional manual methods or computerized regression analysis algorithms employing some form of the above equation . Respiratory mechanics can also be measured passively by various occlusion or forced oscillation techniques …”
Section: Measurement Methods Of Pulmonary Mechanics Energetics and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of pressure developed at the airway opening 100 msec after transient airway occlusion (P 0.1 ) provides a quantitative measure of respiratory drive. [87][88][89] Maximal airway opening pressure after occlusion and maximal airway opening pressure after 100 msec were also reported to reflect respiratory drive. 90 The technique quantifies the reflex inspiratory drive to breathe in response to upper airway occlusion at end-expiration.…”
Section: Transient Airway Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%