2020
DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2020.1814652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the severity of temporomandibular disorders in females: Validity and reliability of the Fonseca anamnestic index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5,11,12,16,31 Subclinical symptoms of TMD have been investigated with FAI, which is used in the early diagnosis and detection of TMD to prevent the progression and early treatment of TMD symptoms, enabling the rapid and accessible collection of large amounts of data at the minimum cost used in many previous studies. 5,19,32,33 Similar to previous studies conducted in various university student populations and reported TMD prevalence between 37-80% 5,[13][14][15][16][17]19,25 , this study, which included only dental assistant program students, also found a high prevalence of TMD (64.8%) compared to the prevalence of TMD absence (35.2%). These results may be due to differences in populations such as genetic structure, physiological differences, sex distribution, or social demographic characteristics, and the anxiety caused by the COVID-19 pandemic at the time of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…5,11,12,16,31 Subclinical symptoms of TMD have been investigated with FAI, which is used in the early diagnosis and detection of TMD to prevent the progression and early treatment of TMD symptoms, enabling the rapid and accessible collection of large amounts of data at the minimum cost used in many previous studies. 5,19,32,33 Similar to previous studies conducted in various university student populations and reported TMD prevalence between 37-80% 5,[13][14][15][16][17]19,25 , this study, which included only dental assistant program students, also found a high prevalence of TMD (64.8%) compared to the prevalence of TMD absence (35.2%). These results may be due to differences in populations such as genetic structure, physiological differences, sex distribution, or social demographic characteristics, and the anxiety caused by the COVID-19 pandemic at the time of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…[18][19][20] Recently, it was also confirmed to be reliable for assessing TMD severity. 21 The FAI was used in many studies to determine the presence and severity of TMDs in non-patient populations. [22][23][24][25][26] However, studies on TMD severity in patient populations are scarce and its relationship with psychological distress and OHRQoL had not been commonly investigated.…”
Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMD şiddet ve prevalansını değerlendirmede kullanılan Fonseca anketi kolay uygulanabilirliği, düşük maliyeti ve kısa zamanda etkili veri sağlaması gibi avantajlara sahiptir (20,21). Daha önce TMD prevalansı ile alakalı birçok çalışmada bu anket tercih edilmiştir (15,(21)(22)(23). Bu çalışmada Fonseca anketine göre 438 öğrencinin %27,6'sında TMD yok iken; %72,4'ünde TMD olup, %46,3'ünde hafif, %19,2'sinde orta ve %6,8'inde ise şiddetli TMD vardır.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…TMD hastalarının sağlıklı popülasyon içerisinde teşhisini koyabilmek ve şiddetini belirlemek amacıyla kullanılan indekslerden birisi de 'Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI)'dir. FAI; Fonseca tarafından oluşturulan, basit, anlaşılır, güvenilirliği ispat edilmiş 10 sorudan oluşan bir ankettir (15,16). Bu çalışmada, Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi öğrencilerinde FAI kullanılarak TMD prevalans ve şiddetinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified