2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the restoration of a degraded semi-humid evergreen broadleaf forest ecosystem by combined single-indicator and comprehensive model method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, the establishment of Eucalyptus plantations does have positive impacts on reducing soil erosion due to the rainfall extreme events (Zhao 1988, Zhou et al 2002. Besides, over-fertilization reduces understory vegetation and groundcover diversity (Evans 1976, Wang et al 2010. Furthermore, the introduction of exotic species and single-layered plantations can make these stands susceptible to insects and diseases (Hu et al 2006, Larjavaara 2008, You et al 2015.…”
Section: Ecological Effects Of Plantationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, the establishment of Eucalyptus plantations does have positive impacts on reducing soil erosion due to the rainfall extreme events (Zhao 1988, Zhou et al 2002. Besides, over-fertilization reduces understory vegetation and groundcover diversity (Evans 1976, Wang et al 2010. Furthermore, the introduction of exotic species and single-layered plantations can make these stands susceptible to insects and diseases (Hu et al 2006, Larjavaara 2008, You et al 2015.…”
Section: Ecological Effects Of Plantationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) Monoculture, repeated planting, short rotations and clear-cutting can directly threaten plantation sustainability (Minghe & Ritchie 1999, Widenfalk & Weslien 2009, Wang et al 2010. By contrast, the complex structure of the mixed forest may favor the productivity and the conservation of biodiversity (Erskine et al 2006, Forrester et al 2006, Grossiord et al 2013, Mayoral et al 2017, Dong et al 2018, Zemp et al 2019.…”
Section: Measures To Improve Forest Plantationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available literature documents that vegetation restoration decreased soil pH because of the increase of CO 2 produced by root respiration, organic acids secreted by roots, and the increase of acidic substances from the decomposition of litter (Wu and Brookes 2005;Peng et al 2011). Accretions in soil CEC are associated with increasing SOM during the vegetation restoration process (Wang et al 2010b). This study also indicated that both the quantity and quality of SOM increased significantly with the Note: SOM is soil organic matter, SOC is soil organic carbon, ROC is readily oxidization carbon, NAOC is non-active organic carbon, TL is toper layer and LL is lower layer, AD is Artemisia desertorum,…”
Section: Effects Of Vegetation Restoration On Soil Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if "forest degradation" is related to the global change mitigation, indicators should point out the loss of trees and their carbon stocks down (Sazaki et al, 2011). Synthetizing, a comprehensive index able to detect "forest degradation" and to support the prioritization of sites for forest restoration is needed (Wang et al, 2010;Ochoa-Gaona et al, 2010;Orsi et al, 2011;Thompson et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%