2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Residual Error in Soft Tissue Setup in Patients Undergoing Partial Breast Irradiation: Results of a Prospective Study Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
50
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The clips implanted in the boundaries of the lumpectomy cavity were prevalently used in guiding target volume delineation and displacement measurement for EB-PBI [8,15,22]. Kim et al [18] analysed 19 studies of respiratory motion in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clips implanted in the boundaries of the lumpectomy cavity were prevalently used in guiding target volume delineation and displacement measurement for EB-PBI [8,15,22]. Kim et al [18] analysed 19 studies of respiratory motion in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target volume was typically defined using surgical clips, the seroma and any post-operative tissue changes when available [9]. The respiratoryinduced displacements and set-up error were important components in EB-PBI planning, and the residual error was not .5 mm after online error correction based on cone-beam CT [15]. Therefore, respiratory-induced TB motion is the major component of the planning target volume for EB-PBI [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of immobilization devices and image-guided RT techniques using cone-beam CT (CBCT) has been demonstrated to improve setup reproducibility in RT for breast cancer. 6,9,10 As was demonstrated in various studies, the setup errors were less when CBCT was used (≤5 mm) and was more (>5 mm) with portal images. 9,10 For this reason, we preferred virtual setup errors of 5 and 10 mm at all directions, for both evaluating setup errors observed with simple methods using portal images and more accurate techniques using CBCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…9 Furthermore, studies evaluating the dose distribution changes originating from setup errors were focused on only target volume dose changes and did not evaluate organs at risk doses and healthy tissues within the irradiated breast. 10 In a study by van Mourik et al 18 , the effects of setup errors and breast changes on dose distribution have been evaluated for wedge, simple IMRT, and full IMRT plans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation