2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the rangelands of southwestern Santiago del Estero, Argentina, for grazing management and research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
23

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
25
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…In preindustrial times, and in current areas associated with a less-affluent social context, shifting cultivation, extensive livestock rearing, and wood extraction have given form to the landscape, leading to spatially dynamic land segmentation characterized by croplands and grassy and woody vegetation in different stages of succession and with different degrees of biomass depletion or appropriation (Chidumayo, 1987;Kunst et al, 2006). In richer and more populated areas, rainfed and irrigated agriculture and mixed crop/livestock production systems occupy the most productive and connected (to markets) areas at present, while extensive grazing and wood extraction are restricted to areas with lower environmental quality or accessibility (Chidumayo, 2002;Grau et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In preindustrial times, and in current areas associated with a less-affluent social context, shifting cultivation, extensive livestock rearing, and wood extraction have given form to the landscape, leading to spatially dynamic land segmentation characterized by croplands and grassy and woody vegetation in different stages of succession and with different degrees of biomass depletion or appropriation (Chidumayo, 1987;Kunst et al, 2006). In richer and more populated areas, rainfed and irrigated agriculture and mixed crop/livestock production systems occupy the most productive and connected (to markets) areas at present, while extensive grazing and wood extraction are restricted to areas with lower environmental quality or accessibility (Chidumayo, 2002;Grau et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rangelands, potential natural vegetation is mapped via land unit classifications such as habitat types (Jensen et al 2001), range units and range sites (Kunst et al 2006), and ecological sites (Bestelmeyer et al 2003). More recently, attention has focused on the delineation of the current states of a set of land units based on its STM (Steele et al 2012).…”
Section: Mapping State-and-transition Model Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One benefit of utilizing remotely sensed data to characterize ecological sites and states is the ability to produce scalable information that can be tailored to particular needs (Kunst et al 2006). For example, West et al (2005) outlined a strategy for producing a hierarchical map of ecological units for 4.5 million hectares area in western Utah based on a variety of data sources.…”
Section: Mapping State-and-transition Model Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire was probably responsible for maintaining that vegetation distribution, since the natives generated many fi res for hunting and war purposes (Morello and Saravia Toledo 1959 ;Bravo et al 2001 ). These changes in landscape and vegetation physiognomy have been caused by livestock overgrazing, indiscriminate logging, changes in the fi re regime, and fencing (Adamoli et al 1972 ;Kunst et al 2006 ). Nowadays, dense shrub thickets and overstocked secondary forests are widespread in the region, a fact that has homogenized the landscape (Adamoli et al 1972 ).…”
Section: The Woody Species 'Problem' In the Chacomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ecological sites) in order to separate the ecosystem into ecologically meaningful and more tractable units is a practice well established in the science of vegetation management for several purposes (Kunst et al 2006 ). Although the defi nition of ecosystem is often arbitrary and not restricted to any particular spatial unit or scale, the grouping of their biological and physical components in homogenous ecological portions (e.g.…”
Section: Ecological Sites and Rbimentioning
confidence: 99%