2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in salt domes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,22 These bacteria can produce hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) in the presence of H 2 . 15,23 During geological H 2 storage, these microorganisms can obtain energy via oxidation of H 2 (electron donor) and reduce sulfate (aq) (SO 4 2 ) (electron acceptor) to sulfide (S 2− ), leading to H 2 S generation and H 2 loss. 24,25 H 2 S could trigger hydrogen embrittlement problems in the wellbore.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 These bacteria can produce hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) in the presence of H 2 . 15,23 During geological H 2 storage, these microorganisms can obtain energy via oxidation of H 2 (electron donor) and reduce sulfate (aq) (SO 4 2 ) (electron acceptor) to sulfide (S 2− ), leading to H 2 S generation and H 2 loss. 24,25 H 2 S could trigger hydrogen embrittlement problems in the wellbore.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen produced by any of these methods can be stored and used for energy generation later, or as chemical feedstock. However, the low density of hydrogen (0.089 kg/m 3 at standard temperature and pressure) and the significantly lower energy potential per unit volume of hydrogen when compared to natural gas (about one-third), means that to store energy at a scale sufficient to meet demands (terawatt-hour range) requires large volumes of hydrogen, and a vast upscaling of subsurface storage availability (e.g., Hashemi et al, 2021;Shuster et al, 2021;Crotogino, 2022;Lankof et al, 2022;Muhammed et al, 2022).…”
Section: Salt Caverns and The Emerging Hydrogen Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current ambitions to decarbonize energy systems to reduce the harmful effects of anthropogenic global warming will require a combination of reducing fossil fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, along with the ambitiously technological goal of capturing and sequestering as much carbon dioxide as possible (Figure 2). Within this framework, a number of technologies have been proposed to help the transition to a stable, safe, low carbon energy economy, these include, but are not limited to: (i) widespread use of carbon capture from industrial processes and subsequent sequestration within the subsurface; (ii) upscaling of hydrogen production and usage requiring upscaling of subsurface hydrogen storage; (iii) wider use of geothermal energy (e.g., Ringrose and Meckel, 2019;Stephenson et al, 2019;Hashemi et al, 2021;Shuster et al, 2021;Tester et al, 2021;Crotogino, 2022;Lankof et al, 2022;Muhammed et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the low density of hydrogen (0.089 kg/m 3 at standard temperature and pressure) and the significantly lower energy potential per unit volume of hydrogen when compared to natural gas (about one-third), means that to store energy at a scale sufficient to meet demands (terawatt-hour range) requires large volumes of hydrogen, and a vast upscaling of subsurface storage availability (e.g. Hashemi et al, 2021;Shuster et al, 2021;Crotogino, 2022;Lankof et al, 2022;Muhammed et al, 2022).…”
Section: Salt Caverns and The Emerging Hydrogen Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this framework, a number of technologies have been proposed to help the transition to a stable, safe, low carbon energy economy, these include, but are not limited to: i) widespread use of carbon capture from industrial processes and subsequent sequestration within the subsurface; ii) upscaling of hydrogen production and usage requiring upscaling of subsurface hydrogen storage; and iii) wider use of geothermal energy (e.g. Ringrose and Meckel., 2019;Stephenson et al, 2019;Hashemi et al, 2021;Shuster et al, 2021;Tester et al, 2021;Crotogino, 2022;Lankof et al, 2022;Muhammed et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%