2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the metal pollution, potential toxicity and speciation of sediment from Algeciras Bay (South of Spain) using chemometric tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(38 reference statements)
5
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The good correlation between Fe and the fine-grained sediment fraction (r = 0.43; P b 0.01), the strong and significant associations (P b 0.01) between Fe and all the potentially toxic elements evaluated (see Table 1) and the abundance of this metal in the Alqueva sediments justified its choice as a normalizer element. This element was already used with this purpose in several studies developed in surface sediments (Díaz-de-Alba et al, 2011;Herut et al, 1993;Salem et al, 2013). Another factor to consider for the establishment of pollution indexes is the geochemical background.…”
Section: Pollution Status Of the Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The good correlation between Fe and the fine-grained sediment fraction (r = 0.43; P b 0.01), the strong and significant associations (P b 0.01) between Fe and all the potentially toxic elements evaluated (see Table 1) and the abundance of this metal in the Alqueva sediments justified its choice as a normalizer element. This element was already used with this purpose in several studies developed in surface sediments (Díaz-de-Alba et al, 2011;Herut et al, 1993;Salem et al, 2013). Another factor to consider for the establishment of pollution indexes is the geochemical background.…”
Section: Pollution Status Of the Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental risk of sediments and its quality could be assessed through the following: (i) pollution indexes, such as the enrichment factor (EF) and the geoaccumulation index (I geo ), that characterized the trace element anthropogenic contributions and the contamination levels, comparing the metal enrichment and the unpolluted reference concentrations (background levels) (Christophoridis et al, 2009;Delgado et al, 2010;Mil-Homens et al, 2007); (ii) sediment quality guidelines (SQGs), which relate the pollution status of sediments, considering the total trace element content, with their adverse effects in aquatic organisms, for instance using the threshold effect level (TEL) and the probable effect level (PEL) (Caeiro et al, 2005;Díaz-de-Alba et al, 2011;Saleem et al, 2013); (iii) and methodologies that evaluate the ecotoxicological risk, taking into consideration the mobility/availability of the pollutant, such as, the risk assessment code (RAC; classification that correlates the percentage of the metal more available, with the risk to the aquatic species) Passos et al, 2010;Yuan et al, 2014). Hence, despite the use of total trace element content as a criterion to assess their possible risk to the aquatic ecosystem, it provides insufficient information about the mobility, bioavailability and consequently toxicity, of these hazardous substances to the aquatic and human populations (Gu et al, 2014;Hooda, 2010;Sundaray et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, two sets of SQGs were applied to assess the ecotoxicology of heavy metals in the sediments: the effect range low (ERL)/the effect range median (ERM) and the low alert level (LAL)/the high alert level (HAL). SQGs of the selected heavy metals were shown in Table 4 ( Alba et al 2011;Long et al 1995). All the mean concentrations exceeded the LAL except Ba.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The background values utilized were in milligrams per kilogram: 80,400 for Al, 95 for Zn, 130 for V, 68 for Ni, 850 for Mn, 20 for Pb, 25 for Cu, 0.098 for Cd, 580 for Ba, 47,000 for Fe, 35 for Cr, and 13 for As, respectively (Alba et al 2011;Taylor and Mclennan 1995;Turekian and Wedepohl 1961). Han et al (2006) divided the contamination into different categories basing on EF values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%