2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011jd016308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the long‐lead probabilistic prediction for the Asian summer monsoon precipitation (1983–2011) based on the APCC multimodel system and a statistical model

Abstract: [1] The performance of the probabilistic multimodel prediction (PMMP) system of the APEC Climate Center (APCC) in predicting the Asian summer monsoon (ASM) precipitation at a four-month lead (with February initial condition) was compared with that of a statistical model using hindcast data for 1983-2005 and real-time forecasts for 2006-2011. Particular attention was paid to probabilistic precipitation forecasts for the boreal summer after the mature phase of El Niño and Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Taking into… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For model data, historical retrospective forecasts from five different coupled models participating in the APEC Climate Center (APCC) one-tier MME 6 month prediction [Sohn et al, 2012a] were considered. The APCC one-tier MME comprises the APCC seasonal prediction system based on the Community Climate System Model [Jeong et al, 2008], Predictive Ocean Atmosphere Model for Australia from the Bureau of Meteorology Research Center [Wang et al, 2008c], the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Coupled Forecast System [Saha et al, 2006], and coupled general circulation models from Seoul National University [Ham and Kang, 2010] and Pusan National University [Sun and Ahn, 2011].…”
Section: Data Sets and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For model data, historical retrospective forecasts from five different coupled models participating in the APEC Climate Center (APCC) one-tier MME 6 month prediction [Sohn et al, 2012a] were considered. The APCC one-tier MME comprises the APCC seasonal prediction system based on the Community Climate System Model [Jeong et al, 2008], Predictive Ocean Atmosphere Model for Australia from the Bureau of Meteorology Research Center [Wang et al, 2008c], the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Coupled Forecast System [Saha et al, 2006], and coupled general circulation models from Seoul National University [Ham and Kang, 2010] and Pusan National University [Sun and Ahn, 2011].…”
Section: Data Sets and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed information of individual models and their initial conditions are available in Sohn et al (2012). For each model, ensemble mean anomalies are calculated on the basis of monthly ensemble-mean climatology for each lead time.…”
Section: Data and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monthly hindcast data are derived from five CGCMs (see Table 1) that are participating in the semi-operational 6-month lead one-tier multi-model ensemble (MME) prediction at Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Climate Center (APCC; Jeong et al 2012;Sohn et al 2012) in cooperation with the Climate Prediction and its Association to Society project (Wang et al 2009;Lee et al 2010). We use individual models integrations initialized on 01 May 2010 (one-month lead) and their MME.…”
Section: Data and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the advances in prediction skills brought about by the MME method, there are still deficiencies and limitations in long-lead predictions of climate variability and extreme phenomena on the local scale. This is especially the case over the extratropics, due to inherently low climate predictability in this region (Lee et al 2011(Lee et al , 2013aSohn et al 2011Sohn et al , 2012. Other factors such as the relatively coarse resolution of global models, uncertainties in initial conditions, forecast lead-time and error growth also limit the skill of long-lead regional climate predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%