2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2013.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the impact of dimensionality reduction methods on information classes and classifiers for hyperspectral image classification by multiple classifier system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we discuss how to select the best set of combinations of spectral bands and acquisition dates from the 36 possible combinations (6 bands and 6 dates). Dimensionality reduction is a common preprocessing step in supervised classification, since it prevents possible redundancy in the datasets and overfitting [20]. Moreover, dimensionality reduction may permit reducing the amount of data (fewer acquisition dates) and computational effort.…”
Section: Variable Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we discuss how to select the best set of combinations of spectral bands and acquisition dates from the 36 possible combinations (6 bands and 6 dates). Dimensionality reduction is a common preprocessing step in supervised classification, since it prevents possible redundancy in the datasets and overfitting [20]. Moreover, dimensionality reduction may permit reducing the amount of data (fewer acquisition dates) and computational effort.…”
Section: Variable Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, β R ] t is the output weight between the hidden layer nodes and the output nodes, and C (ψ l , v j ) is competence value of the jth validation sample of the classifier ψ l obtained from (9). For all the validation samples j, (14) can represented as…”
Section: Proposed Dcs/des-elm Methods and Spectral-spatial Des Apprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explicitly, the diversity in the MCS is created by defining a diversity measure and optimizing it. Implicitly, diversity can be introduced by selecting a subset of features [10]- [12], training samples manipulation, selecting classifiers from different categories, and different feature extraction methods [13], [14]. However, the diversity constraint alone does not guarantee that the MCS always performs better.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing can quickly obtain surface information, achieve understanding, and study surface characteristics of the spatial distribution through transferring, processing, and analyzing the data. The advantage of high spectral resolution remote sensing is that it can obtain many continuous band spectral images therefore, it achieves a fine description of ground targets and reaches the purpose of identifying features, especially suitable for plant fine classification compared with the conventional remote sensing methods [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%