2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02582.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the impact of resistant and susceptible canola on Plasmodiophora brassicae inoculum potential

Abstract: The impact on clubroot severity of growing susceptible canola or mixtures of resistant and susceptible canola genotypes was examined. Bioassays revealed greater clubroot severity and incidence, and reduced plant height, where 100% of a susceptible cultivar had been grown. A higher proportion of susceptible plants within a resistant canola crop increased root hair and secondary infections. Regression analysis of root hair infection and the amount of Plasmodiophora brassicae DNA (as determined by quantitative PC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fields with P. brassicae infestations, the clubroot severity observed in plant stands seeded with CR canola was very low (ID rarely >10% and generally <4.15%). These mild symptoms of clubroot even in the presence of relatively high levels of P. brassicae inoculum probably reflected the fact that this study was focused on CR canola, which would not be expected to develop much disease (Hwang et al ., ). Nevertheless, greater initial concentrations of inoculum did result in slightly higher levels of disease in CR canola crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In fields with P. brassicae infestations, the clubroot severity observed in plant stands seeded with CR canola was very low (ID rarely >10% and generally <4.15%). These mild symptoms of clubroot even in the presence of relatively high levels of P. brassicae inoculum probably reflected the fact that this study was focused on CR canola, which would not be expected to develop much disease (Hwang et al ., ). Nevertheless, greater initial concentrations of inoculum did result in slightly higher levels of disease in CR canola crops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(), where the concentration of resting spores in the soil was an essential factor in the subsequent development of a clubroot epidemic. Similarly, repeated cropping of susceptible OSR over 4‐ and 6‐week cycles increased clubroot severity over time (Hwang et al ., ). Another interesting finding in this study is that a few of the spores obtained from 7 dpi‐roots were mature enough to infect new host plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The study of Hwang et al . () showed that the pathogen could produce up to 10 10 resting spores⁄g gall under field conditions. They found that repeated growing of susceptible OSR resulted in greater gall fresh weight and favoured the rapid build‐up of resting spores in the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there were no consistent differences among the resistant cultivars for RHI, and cultivar × isolate interactions for the incidence of the developmental stages of RHI were very small, which indicates that all of these resistant cultivars reacted in the same way to all of the isolates assessed. This supports the results of two recent studies that demonstrated the initial levels of RHI were higher in a susceptible canola cultivar than in ‘45H29’, which was the first clubroot‐resistant canola cultivar registered in Canada (Deora et al ., ; Hwang et al ., ). In the moderately resistant cv.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…brassicae (root hair infection) occurs in both susceptible and resistant cultivars of host species, and even in non‐host crops (Ludwig‐Müller et al ., ; Deora et al ., ; Feng et al ., ). However, the infection success and rate of pathogen development in roots hairs differ slightly among canola cultivars, with development occurring quickly in susceptible lines, more slowly in highly resistant lines, and slower still in cultivars with intermediate resistance (Deora et al ., ; Hwang et al ., ). Clubroot resistance is expressed most clearly and consistently in the root cortex, where pathogen development occurred quickly in susceptible cultivars, more slowly in cultivars with intermediate resistance, and there is little or no pathogen development in highly resistant cultivars (Kroll et al ., ; Deora et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%