1984
DOI: 10.2190/d4y4-phdr-4g3l-waax
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Impact of Monetary Incentives upon Smoking Behavior

Abstract: Following the recent innovative use of monetary incentives by some business firms to discourage cigarette smoking among their employees, this study attempts to evaluate the merits of such programs in a carefully controlled environment. Results indicated that a monetary incentive was generally effective in discouraging people from smoking cigarettes. Interestingly, a monetary incentive offered to groups appeared to be more effective in bringing about behavioral changes among females than among males. Conversely… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten experimental studies have been published evaluating the efficacy of incentives in promoting smoking abstinence in adolescents (Corby et al, 2000; Gray et al, 2011; Krishnan-Sarin et al, 2006; Reynolds et al, 2008; Roll, 2005; Tevyaw et al, 2007) and college students (Correia & Benson, 2006; Irons & Correia, 2008; Kassaye, 1984; Tevyaw et al, 2009). Of these, eight showed a significant treatment effect (Corby et al, 2000; Correia & Benson, 2006; Irons & Correia, 2008; Kassaye, 1984; Krishnan-Sarin et al, 2006; Reynolds et al, 2008; Roll, 2005; Tevyaw et al, 2009). They generally involved brief durations (range: 1–4 weeks), a wide range of visit frequencies (range: 1×/week-3×/day), and moderate incentive magnitudes (mean: $47.27/week; range: $17.49– $94.50/week).…”
Section: Incentives For Smoking Cessation In Special Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten experimental studies have been published evaluating the efficacy of incentives in promoting smoking abstinence in adolescents (Corby et al, 2000; Gray et al, 2011; Krishnan-Sarin et al, 2006; Reynolds et al, 2008; Roll, 2005; Tevyaw et al, 2007) and college students (Correia & Benson, 2006; Irons & Correia, 2008; Kassaye, 1984; Tevyaw et al, 2009). Of these, eight showed a significant treatment effect (Corby et al, 2000; Correia & Benson, 2006; Irons & Correia, 2008; Kassaye, 1984; Krishnan-Sarin et al, 2006; Reynolds et al, 2008; Roll, 2005; Tevyaw et al, 2009). They generally involved brief durations (range: 1–4 weeks), a wide range of visit frequencies (range: 1×/week-3×/day), and moderate incentive magnitudes (mean: $47.27/week; range: $17.49– $94.50/week).…”
Section: Incentives For Smoking Cessation In Special Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The $100 monetary incentive served as the basic level of treatment because all participants were eligible to receive it contingent on achieving and maintaining abstinence for 6 months. Several controlled studies have shown that external incentives may reduce smoking rates (Kassaye, 1984; Klesges, Vasey, & Glasgow, 1986; Stitzer & Bigelow, 1983). Although we cannot separate the effects of the incentive in this study, it is clear that the self-help materials failed to increase the effectiveness of the monetary incentive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%