2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-1072-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the impact of EHR heterogeneity for clinical research through a case study of silent brain infarction

Abstract: Background: The rapid adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) holds great promise for advancing medicine through practice-based knowledge discovery. However, the validity of EHR-based clinical research is questionable due to poor research reproducibility caused by the heterogeneity and complexity of healthcare institutions and EHR systems, the cross-disciplinary nature of the research team, and the lack of standard processes and best practices for conducting EHR-based clinical research. Method: We develop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neurological function of both groups after the intervention was measured using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [ 19 ], with 11 items and a total score of 42 points. A higher score represented more severe neurological impairment in patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neurological function of both groups after the intervention was measured using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [ 19 ], with 11 items and a total score of 42 points. A higher score represented more severe neurological impairment in patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics of the cohort were described previously [ 8 ]. The mean ages were 65 (± 10.6) and 66 (± 9.7) for the Mayo and Tufts cohorts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients older than 50 years with neuroimaging (CT, MRI) between 1/2009 and 10/2015 and no history of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or dementia were identified at two centers (Mayo Clinic, Tufts Medical Center). 1000 CT and MRI studies (500 each) were randomly selected through a previously described protocol [ 8 ]. The residents and neuroradiologists were instructed on annotation of the presence and characteristics of SBIs and WMD according to a consensus guide developed by two study investigators (LYL, PHL) ( Additional file 1 : Expanded Methods).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy of data obtained through automated EHR characterization versus manual searches has been studied in diverse contexts, with heterogeneity of the EHR and variable agreement between abstraction methods being common themes. [4][5][6] Manual EHR abstraction, while considered a gold standard, 7 compares to automated abstraction in its susceptibility to quality issues due to clinical or administrative coding errors and also missing data. However, despite common limitations due to underlying data quality, potential advantages of automated, standardized search techniques are numerous, including more timely results, reduced labor intensity, reduced likelihood of data entry errors, unbiased queries, larger sample sizes, and capacity to define search parameter ranges precisely.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%