2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-7278(2000)15:1<28::aid-tox5>3.0.co;2-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the impact of a bleached kraft mill effluent on a south-central USA river

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatively few field studies exist, either in mesocosms or in natural streams, that have examined the effects of PPME on macroinvertebrate communities (e.g., Hall et al 1991; Culp et al 2000, 2003). In many cases, these studies are limited to a single season (e.g., Felder et al 1998; D'Surney et al 2000) or year (e.g., Mayack and Waterhouse 1983). As a component of the Long‐Term Receiving Water Study (LTRWS), we collected macroinvertebrates twice per year over an 8‐ to 9‐y period from multiple sites upstream and downstream of PPME discharges on 4 receiving water streams to determine if macroinvertebrate communities exposed to PPME differed significantly from those at unexposed sites in each of the 4 streams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively few field studies exist, either in mesocosms or in natural streams, that have examined the effects of PPME on macroinvertebrate communities (e.g., Hall et al 1991; Culp et al 2000, 2003). In many cases, these studies are limited to a single season (e.g., Felder et al 1998; D'Surney et al 2000) or year (e.g., Mayack and Waterhouse 1983). As a component of the Long‐Term Receiving Water Study (LTRWS), we collected macroinvertebrates twice per year over an 8‐ to 9‐y period from multiple sites upstream and downstream of PPME discharges on 4 receiving water streams to determine if macroinvertebrate communities exposed to PPME differed significantly from those at unexposed sites in each of the 4 streams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of pulp and paper mill effluent (PPME) on fish have been extensively investigated in the past by means of laboratory tests (Kovacs et al 1995; Parrott et al 2003, 2006), mesocosms (Borton et al 1996; Sepulveda et al 2003), and field studies (Karås et al 1991; Sanström 1994; Kovacs et al 1997; D'Surney et al 2000). A variety of effluent‐related effects have been noted, with alterations in reproductive indicators receiving the most attention (Hewitt et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although population‐level field studies have been conducted (Sanström 1996; Kovacs et al 1997; McMaster et al 2006), studies examining the relationship between PPME and community structure and function in effluent‐receiving streams are rare. Few studies have compared fish community structure in rivers downstream of PPME discharges to communities at reference sites (Adams et al 1996; D'Surney et al 2000; Kovacs et al 2002; Greenfield and Bart 2005), and some community‐level studies in lake and marine environments have also been completed (Hansson 1987; Neuman and Karås 1988; Karels and Niemi 2002; Sanström and Neuman 2003). In most cases, studies were conducted over relatively short periods of time and provided a snapshot assessment of fish condition, although some studies were designed to examine improvements in fish community measures after mill operational changes that improved PPME quality (Kovacs et al 2002; Sanström and Neuman 2003; Greenfield and Bart 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, sex ratios of Gambusia reared in 100% fi nal effl uent were not altered from controls (McCarthy et al 2004). Decreased potential fecundity, measured as brood size of developing embryos, was reported in early preliminary work (Rosa-Molinar and Williams 1984); however, these observations were not detected in more recent studies (Felder et al 1998;D'Surney et al 2000). Recent reports (Noggle 2005;Noggle et al 2010) have also demonstrated that improvements in processing technologies and reductions in black liquor losses by the paper industry have reduced masculinization responses in Gambusia relative to these initial investigations: (Howell et al 1980;Drysdale and Bortone 1989;Cody and Bortone 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%