2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the fire resistance of a nuclear power plant subjected to a large commercial aircraft crash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies of aircraft impact events with different impact velocities have been considered in previous research (Dritter and Gruner, 1976;Zorn and Schueller, 1986;Sugano et al, 1993;Abbas et al, 1996;Arros and Doumbalski, 2007;Petrangeli, 2010;Frano and Forasassi, 2011;Wilt et al, 2011;Iqbal et al, 2012;Jeon et al, 2012;Lu et al, 2015;Thai and Kim, 2015;Jeon and Jin, 2016). The impact velocities are 235, 247, 293 m/s in the September 11 event, while the most previously considered impact velocities were less than 220 m/s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The studies of aircraft impact events with different impact velocities have been considered in previous research (Dritter and Gruner, 1976;Zorn and Schueller, 1986;Sugano et al, 1993;Abbas et al, 1996;Arros and Doumbalski, 2007;Petrangeli, 2010;Frano and Forasassi, 2011;Wilt et al, 2011;Iqbal et al, 2012;Jeon et al, 2012;Lu et al, 2015;Thai and Kim, 2015;Jeon and Jin, 2016). The impact velocities are 235, 247, 293 m/s in the September 11 event, while the most previously considered impact velocities were less than 220 m/s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last several decades, the crashworthiness design and the safety assessment for the protecting shell of nuclear power plants (NPP) subjected to the malevolent aircraft impact have attracted great interests due to the increasing threats of the terrorist attacks and the rapidly https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.nucengdes.2018.11.034 Received 15 August 2018; Received in revised form 7 November 2018; Accepted 26 November 2018 growing numbers of NPP (Abbas et al, 1996;Itoh et al, 2005;Li et al, 2005;Arros and Doumbalski, 2007;Petrangeli, 2010;Frano and Forasassi, 2011;Iqbal et al, 2012;Jeon et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2013;Sadique et al, 2013;Kostov et al, 2014;Siefert and Henkel, 2014;Tennant et al, 2014;Andonov, et al, 2015;Lu et al, 2015;Thai and Kim, 2015;Jeon and Jin, 2016;Hu et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018). The histories of the impact force and the impact impulse have to be estimated from the expected impact velocities in order to assess the effects of aircraft impacts on the protecting shell of NPP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is condition is considered the most destructive case as reported by Sadique et al [11] and Zhang et al [13]. e initial velocity of the aircraft is assumed to be 150 m/s, which is used by Jeon et al [30] for structures with relatively low altitude. e time increments range from 3e-7 s to 7e-7 s. It has been demonstrated that further reduction in the time increment does not result in discrepancies in the calculated results.…”
Section: Integral Crash Analysis Of Boeing 767-200ermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbas [7] and Kukreja [8] analysed the outer containment wall using load versus time history curve for Boeing 707-320 and many aircrafts. After that, Jeon et al [9] evaluated the response of a nuclear containment wall against fire resistance for a large commercial aircraft crash. The present study focuses on the studying the behavior of a nuclear containment of outer concrete layer 0.85 m thick with 6 mm thick steel liner and 60m high against the impact of an aircraft and its subsequent fire induced stresses.…”
Section: Revised Manuscript Received On September 15 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%