Assessment of the Environmental and Physical Ergonomic Conditions of ORs in Turkey

Yasak, Kübra; Vural, Fatma

doi:10.1002/aorn.12841

Cited by 8 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar to this finding, many studies have found that noise levels during surgery exceed the WHO recommendation. In the study conducted by Yasak and Vural 21 in Turkey, the mean noise level during surgery was 54.29 dB(A). Keller et al 5 found that the mean noise levels in three phases of surgery were as follows: 54.52 ± 1.55, 55.84 ± 1.73, and 56.34 ± 1.93 dB(A).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Noise Levels in the Operating Room on the Stress Levels and Workload of the Operating Room Team

Arabacı

Önler

2021

Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research was conducted to evaluate the noise levels and the effect of noise on the workload and stress levels of the operating room (OR) staff of a public hospital. Design: Descriptive and cross-sectional study. Methods: The data were obtained by measuring ambient noise during 403 orthopaedic, urological, and general surgeries on weekdays between July and October 2019. We measured the noise by dividing the surgery into three phases. These phases are as follows: from the entry of the patient, induction of anesthesia, and preparation of the surgical area until the start of the procedure (Phase I), from the incision until the completion of closure and dressing application (Phase II), from the completion of closure and dressing application until the exit of the patient (Phase III). Furthermore, the workload and stress levels of 45 OR staff who work in the general surgery, orthopaedics, and urology ORs were measured. Data were collected using a CA 834 noise measurement device, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form TX-I), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Task Load Index Workload Scale, and Information form related to surgery and ORs. Findings: The noise in the OR was higher than 35 dB, A-weighted [dB(A)], the limit proposed by the World Health Organization for hospitals. Phase I average noise level was 63.00 ± 3.50, Phase II average noise level was 62.94 ± 3.75, and Phase III average noise level was 63.67 ± 2.81. The mean anxiety score was 34.50 ± 6.09. The total workload level was found to be 56.91 ± 15.67. Anxiety scores and workload scores had positive weak and moderate correlations with noise levels (P < .01). Conclusions: The noise in the OR was high, and anxiety scores and workload scores correlated positively with noise levels.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Noise Levels in the Operating Room on the Stress Levels and Workload of the Operating Room Team

Arabacı

Önler

2021

Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Researchers used a variety of data collection methods, including survey, 15,16,20,23,24,25 survey with a physical examination, 26 survey with an observation, 17-19 survey with an observation and a skills checklist, 22 survey with observations and interviews, 21 and observations 27 …”

Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some recent literature addressed the ergonomic risks that surgeons face in the OR, 23,28,29 and multiple studies included perioperative personnel 16‐22,24‐27 . However, few of the studies we reviewed focused on perioperative nurses, 17,18,22 and one study conducted in the Netherlands focused on operating assistants— non‐nurse team members who functioned in the circulator, scrub person, and first assistant roles 20 .…”

Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, few of the studies we reviewed focused on perioperative nurses, 17,18,22 and one study conducted in the Netherlands focused on operating assistants— non‐nurse team members who functioned in the circulator, scrub person, and first assistant roles 20 . Researchers studied either the perioperative work environment 21,24,25,27 or musculoskeletal disorders and posture of perioperative workers 16-19,20,22,26 …”

Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In Turkey, researchers assessed the environmental and physical ergonomic conditions that may place perioperative staff members at risk for injury 27 . After observing 58 surgeries across 10 surgical specialties in ORs in Turkey, the researchers identified a lack of available equipment for lifting and moving patients, tables for instruments, stools for rest periods, and antifatigue mats for those standing for long periods of time.…”

Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Ergonomic Challenges in the Perioperative Setting

Apple¹,

Letvak²

2021

AORN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Working in health care can be physically stressful. The perioperative setting, which is largely concealed from other health care workers and the general public, places unique physical demands on its workers. Perioperative personnel are responsible for a variety of physical tasks, including moving and positioning patients, holding extremities, and moving equipment and supplies. As the nursing workforce ages, the physical demands of the perioperative environment may affect the development of musculoskeletal disorders in older nurses. The purpose of this article is to review published research and describe the ergonomic challenges of working in the OR. There currently is a paucity of literature on the effects of ergonomic risk factors on perioperative nurses in the United States. This article also provides some recommendations for perioperative staff members and leaders that may assist them with creating and maintaining a healthy and safe work environment.

show abstract

Implementing a Surgical Smoke Evacuation Policy and Procedure: A Quality Improvement Project

Ostapovych¹,

Vortman²

2022

AORN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Energy‐generating surgical devices (eg, electrosurgical units, lasers) produce surgical smoke that can cause negative health effects in exposed individuals. In 2019, a review of nursing documentation at an urban teaching hospital revealed that personnel were properly evacuating surgical smoke during less than 0.5% of applicable procedures. To address the noncompliance and reduce exposure to surgical smoke, an interdisciplinary team initiated a quality improvement project to implement a surgical smoke evacuation policy for all smoke‐generating procedures. The project included creation and implementation of a smoke evacuation policy, staff member education on the hazards of surgical smoke and proper evacuation device use, and acquisition of the proper smoke evacuation equipment. After instituting the policy in June 2020, results of a three‐month chart audit showed that there was nursing documentation confirming personnel used energy‐generating devices and the corresponding surgical smoke evacuation devices during 664 of 2,224 procedures, for a compliance rate of 30%.

show abstract

Assessment of the Environmental and Physical Ergonomic Conditions of ORs in Turkey

Cited by 8 publications

References 10 publications

The Effect of Noise Levels in the Operating Room on the Stress Levels and Workload of the Operating Room Team

The Effect of Noise Levels in the Operating Room on the Stress Levels and Workload of the Operating Room Team

Ergonomic Challenges in the Perioperative Setting

Implementing a Surgical Smoke Evacuation Policy and Procedure: A Quality Improvement Project

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About