2020
DOI: 10.3390/en13236276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Electromagnetic Field Exposure during the Use of Portable Radios in the Context of Potential Health Effects

Abstract: The paper presents research on the electromagnetic hazards related to the flow of electric currents throughout the bodies of employees using portable radios. The values often exceed established limits, which may lead to potential dysfunctions of the body and affect the safety of performed professional duties. The measurements of the electric field (E-field) distribution of a typical commercial portable radio, the limb contact current calculations, and the computer simulations determining a specific absorption … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results show compliance with the European Directive on worker’s exposure limits [ 15 ]. Kieliszek et al [ 31 ] performed a study assessing the exposure due to the use of a portable radio. Specifically, they performed the measurements of the electric field distribution at 10 cm from the antenna of a typical commercial portable radio working at 30, 55 and 80 MHz for three typical radiophone powers (0.1, 1, 5 W).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results show compliance with the European Directive on worker’s exposure limits [ 15 ]. Kieliszek et al [ 31 ] performed a study assessing the exposure due to the use of a portable radio. Specifically, they performed the measurements of the electric field distribution at 10 cm from the antenna of a typical commercial portable radio working at 30, 55 and 80 MHz for three typical radiophone powers (0.1, 1, 5 W).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By making this comparison, it was highlighted that in almost all cases the limits were respected, in terms of exposure limits values (ELVs) and/or in terms of action levels (ALs). This is truer for the radiocommunication devices for which both experimental and dosimetric studies were performed [ 20 , 21 ], and localization/surveillance devices (radar), for which exposure measurement campaigns were performed in areas occupied by the military personnel [ 7 , 31 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Conversely, exposure assessment of the EMF generated by jammer devices and wearable devices is still limited or, as in case of the EM directed-energy weapons, completely lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very different but equally fascinating study comes from [6]. Here, we note that the authors are interested in the flow of electrical current in employees' bodies when using portable radios.…”
Section: Verification Of Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In citing two exposure standards, ref. [6] recognized that exposure can lead to thermal effects but that neither the thermal effects nor the density of induced electric currents exceeds the limits presented in the quoted standards. Here, the authors did not just use the approach of modelling a system and then simulating it; instead, they took two experimental measurements (linked in one theme) and a simulation-based study:…”
Section: Verification Of Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%