2017
DOI: 10.4172/2573-458x.1000119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Efficiency of a Pilot Constructed Wetland on the Remediation of Water Quality; Case Study of Litani River, Lebanon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average removal efficiencies were 87.01 6 14.67% for COD, 64.99 6 4.85% for BOD 5 , 86.18 6 14.52% for TSS, 43.11 6 12.50% for NO 3 AN, 34.82 6 20.35% for NH 4 AN, 55.07 6 33.85% for PO 4 AP and 73.05 6 39.23% for K ( Table 3). Some of the results are different from those reported by Amacha et al (2017) who worked on the same wetland for the season extending from April 2014 till July 2015; particularly, the average removal efficiencies were 62.47% for NO 3 AN, 93.3% for NH 4 AN and 82.82% for PO 4 AP, higher than the values obtained in the current study. They show clearly that the performance of the wetland for the removal of physic-chemical contaminants is decreasing year after year, this could be mainly attributed to a bad maintenance of wetland vegetation.…”
Section: Physico-chemical Analyses Of Wetland Influent and Effluentcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average removal efficiencies were 87.01 6 14.67% for COD, 64.99 6 4.85% for BOD 5 , 86.18 6 14.52% for TSS, 43.11 6 12.50% for NO 3 AN, 34.82 6 20.35% for NH 4 AN, 55.07 6 33.85% for PO 4 AP and 73.05 6 39.23% for K ( Table 3). Some of the results are different from those reported by Amacha et al (2017) who worked on the same wetland for the season extending from April 2014 till July 2015; particularly, the average removal efficiencies were 62.47% for NO 3 AN, 93.3% for NH 4 AN and 82.82% for PO 4 AP, higher than the values obtained in the current study. They show clearly that the performance of the wetland for the removal of physic-chemical contaminants is decreasing year after year, this could be mainly attributed to a bad maintenance of wetland vegetation.…”
Section: Physico-chemical Analyses Of Wetland Influent and Effluentcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…They show clearly that the performance of the wetland for the removal of physic-chemical contaminants is decreasing year after year, this could be mainly attributed to a bad maintenance of wetland vegetation. Only the removal efficiency of BOD 5 (66.08%) was similar to that obtained by Amacha et al (2017). The results are also in agreement with the findings of El-Sheikh et al (2010) with removal rates of 52% BOD 5 , 87% TSS and 52% PO 4 for a free surface constructed wetland in Egypt.…”
Section: Physico-chemical Analyses Of Wetland Influent and Effluentsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the efficiency of the wetland system in phytoremediation and/or the competence of the macrophytes can be affected by different climatic conditions, soil type or aquatic biodiversity [25]. Both natural and constructed wetlands are worldwide considered as a cost-effective and an alternative technology for polluted water and wastewater treatment, they have been increasingly used to successfully remove pollutants from domestic and industrial effluents [11,14,26,27]. Macrophytes used in phytoremediation in CW systems can diverge to various types based on their adaptations to life in water.…”
Section: Natural and Constructed Wetlands In Phytoremediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wetland plants can take up heavy metals and nutrients through root systems and accumulate them in the biomass reducing therefore the concentrations of these polluting elements. The common reed (Phragmites australis) and cattail (Typha angustifolia) can uptake and accumulate a large amount of nutrients and heavy metals in their below and above water , 0 [13,26,30] (Table 1). In CWs, phytoremediation plant species are able to absorb multiple pollutants simultaneously because pollution rarely occurs as a single chemical and grow fast [11].…”
Section: Macrophytes For Phytoremediationmentioning
confidence: 99%