2000
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.126.12.1487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Efficacy of Endoscopy in Pituitary Adenoma Resection

Abstract: Endoscopy provides distinct advantages over microscopy in imaging intrasellar and parasellar structures during pituitary tumor resection. These data support the numerous anecdotal accounts of the usefulness of pituitary endoscopy and are consistent with the small amount of objective evidence offered on the subject. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1487-1490

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique has subsequently been refined and popularized, by Jho et al [10,22,23]. The initial reports on the use of this technique have highlighted the endoscope and its superior visualization and suggest that this minimally invasive technique might allow a more complete tumor removal and a reduced rate of complications [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique has subsequently been refined and popularized, by Jho et al [10,22,23]. The initial reports on the use of this technique have highlighted the endoscope and its superior visualization and suggest that this minimally invasive technique might allow a more complete tumor removal and a reduced rate of complications [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endoscopic endonasal approach avoids transseptal dissection, thus reducing patient discomfort and postoperative pain. The endoscope has increasingly been used in pituitary surgery since the mid 1990s either in conjunction with the microscopic technique (24) or as a pure endoscopic procedure (18,25,26). Especially the better panoramic visualization of sellar, supra-and parasellar anatomy with increased illumination and magnification are recognized as major advantages offered by the endoscopic technique (21,25,27).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas a shortcoming of endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery is the loss of binocular vision, microscopic techniques typically result in more sinonasal dissection and potentially more sinonasal morbidity postoperatively. Notwithstanding short-term data suggest that outcomes and complication rates of MIPS compare well to traditional transnasal transsphenoidal approaches, with reduced need for packing, 4 shorter operative times, [5][6][7] decreased blood loss, 8 improved differentiation between normal tissue and tumor, 9 better visualization of intrasellar and parasellar structures, and shorter hospital stays. 1,4,10 While these factors have been thought to translate into improved patient satisfaction and comfort, few studies have examined patient perceptions before and after MIPS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%