2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9978-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the effectiveness of nature reserve management in China

Abstract: Assessing the management effectiveness of nature reserves is an effective way to promote management quality and achieve management targets. Using a questionnaire developed by the World Bank (WB) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) as a tool for tracking management effectiveness, we carried out a survey in 535 nature reserves in China to assess the management status quo in 2005. The results indicated that the indices related to management regulation, infrastructure and equipment, monitoring and evaluation,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(31 reference statements)
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to these other protected areas, the ZNWP scored higher in resource management and lower in community input to management, budget, and equipment needs. In contrast, in the ZNWP, progress with boundary delineation was scored low, and management systems and regulations were scored high (Table 1), the opposite of findings by Quan et al (2009Quan et al ( , 2011. Compared with the management performance of two other protected areas in different geographic settings, the Yellow River Delta National Nature Reserve (a coastal wetland in eastern PRC; He et al, 2012) and Pudacuo National Park (a forested mountain region in south-western PRC; Zhou & Grumbine, 2011), the ZNWP showed similar trends, with most government attention focused on tourism, limited or no biodiversity monitoring, incomplete boundary demarcation, and/or the possibility that some economic development may not comply with protected area regulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Similar to these other protected areas, the ZNWP scored higher in resource management and lower in community input to management, budget, and equipment needs. In contrast, in the ZNWP, progress with boundary delineation was scored low, and management systems and regulations were scored high (Table 1), the opposite of findings by Quan et al (2009Quan et al ( , 2011. Compared with the management performance of two other protected areas in different geographic settings, the Yellow River Delta National Nature Reserve (a coastal wetland in eastern PRC; He et al, 2012) and Pudacuo National Park (a forested mountain region in south-western PRC; Zhou & Grumbine, 2011), the ZNWP showed similar trends, with most government attention focused on tourism, limited or no biodiversity monitoring, incomplete boundary demarcation, and/or the possibility that some economic development may not comply with protected area regulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Furthermore, it is difficult to compare data obtained from monitoring populations or biodiversity between sites [70]. In practice, the most common approaches to evaluation have been qualitative, involving the use of scorecards, expert judgments and experience-based knowledge [70][71][72][73]. These evaluation methods do not necessarily directly link conservation interventions and conservation effects, except through the experts' own evaluations [70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of budget compromises reserves' protection duties: they are poorly or never patrolled, species and ecosystems are not satisfactorily monitored nor inventoried, and some reserves do not even have signposts delineating their borders (Qiu et al, 2009;Xu H. et al, 2009;Quan et al, 2011). In the recent study of Quan et al (2011), some worrying figures arose, such as a mere 2% of the nature reserves had enough financial support for their daily management activities, and that only ca. 11% had set up comprehensive monitoring systems.…”
Section: Protected Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another consequence of lack of investment is the frequent failure of compensation schemes (subsidies, compensation fees) to the local people (a problem often aggravated by the widespread corruption among local officials), who may be against the establishment of new PAs because they feel that their interests are in conflict with nature preservation. Tourism creates opportunities for local people, but this should evolve towards sustainability, and planned and managed to combine biodiversity protection while ensuring adequate economic benefits to local communities (Quan et al, 2011). Engaging local communities in conservation activities as well as in the planning and management of reserves also constitutes a useful tool for the long-term sustainability of nature reserves, since the pressures placed on reserves by local residents are largely eased (McBeath & Leng, 2006;MacKinnon & Xie, 2008).…”
Section: Protected Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%