The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the effectiveness of attenuation of Pb aprons by using TLD dosimetry and Monte Carlo calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since linear attenuation coefficient varies with the density of the attenuating material, the attenuation of the prepared nanocomposite blocks is given in terms of the mass attenuation coefficient (l q ). The mass attenuation coefficient is defined as the linear attenuation coefficient per unit density of the material (Davila et al 2017;Ersundu et al 2017). Nanocomposites containing 25 wt% G2 nanoparticles exhibit the highest mass attenuation coefficient compared to the rest of the prepared samples and is found to be in the range of 7.77-0.09 cm 2 /g for X-ray photon energy of 30-47 keV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since linear attenuation coefficient varies with the density of the attenuating material, the attenuation of the prepared nanocomposite blocks is given in terms of the mass attenuation coefficient (l q ). The mass attenuation coefficient is defined as the linear attenuation coefficient per unit density of the material (Davila et al 2017;Ersundu et al 2017). Nanocomposites containing 25 wt% G2 nanoparticles exhibit the highest mass attenuation coefficient compared to the rest of the prepared samples and is found to be in the range of 7.77-0.09 cm 2 /g for X-ray photon energy of 30-47 keV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For medical radiation qualities, the underestimation of the unshielded Hp (10) in a measurement on the outside of the apron is in the order of 25% (12). In the extrapolation of annual doses from such measurements it needs to be taken into account, to ensure a conservative result, even though the larger influence on the accuracy of the extrapolation will be the uncertainty of the shielding factor of the apron in this calculation (13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Uncertainties and Detection Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WBD was measured on the outside of the lead apron in order to increase the signal to the dosemeter. When reporting calculated annual dose values for the WBD in the "Results" section, the measured value was decreased by a factor 10, representing the shielding of the apron (13)(14)(15). Furthermore, the annual dose was corrected for the systematic uncertainty in backscatter, as explained in the "Uncertainties and detection limits" section.…”
Section: Calculated Annual Dosementioning
confidence: 99%