2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the effect of reduced compositional heterogeneity on fracture resistance of human cortical bone using finite element modeling

Abstract: The recent reports of atypical femoral fracture (AFF) and its possible association with prolonged bisphosphonate (BP) use highlighted the importance of a thorough understanding of mechanical modifications in bone due to bisphosphonate treatment. The reduced compositional heterogeneity is one of the modifications in bone due to extensive suppression of bone turnover. Although experimental evaluations suggested that compositional changes lead to a reduction in the heterogeneity of elastic properties, there is li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The changes in mechanical properties, without concomitant changes in bone microstructure, suggest that important changes in bone material composition may contribute to the observed mechanical difference, further supported by the observed increase in calculated apparent yield and peak stress. Compositional changes in bone have been associated with osteoporosis, and heterogeneity of these measurements is also emerging as an important contributor to bone mechanical properties, and fragility fracture risk ( Lloyd et al, 2015 ; Boskey et al, 2016 ; Donnelly et al, 2012 ; Tai et al, 2007 ; Wang et al, 2016 ; Demirtas et al, 2016 ; Gourion-Arsiquaud et al, 2010 ; Vennin et al, 2017 ; Yao et al, 2011 ). Nano- to microscale bone heterogeneity likely plays a crucial role in understanding bone mechanical properties and their role in fracture-risk ( Lloyd et al, 2015 ; Boskey et al, 2016 ; Donnelly et al, 2012 ; Tai et al, 2007 ; Wang et al, 2016 ; Demirtas et al, 2016 ; Gourion-Arsiquaud et al, 2010 ; Vennin et al, 2017 ; Yao et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes in mechanical properties, without concomitant changes in bone microstructure, suggest that important changes in bone material composition may contribute to the observed mechanical difference, further supported by the observed increase in calculated apparent yield and peak stress. Compositional changes in bone have been associated with osteoporosis, and heterogeneity of these measurements is also emerging as an important contributor to bone mechanical properties, and fragility fracture risk ( Lloyd et al, 2015 ; Boskey et al, 2016 ; Donnelly et al, 2012 ; Tai et al, 2007 ; Wang et al, 2016 ; Demirtas et al, 2016 ; Gourion-Arsiquaud et al, 2010 ; Vennin et al, 2017 ; Yao et al, 2011 ). Nano- to microscale bone heterogeneity likely plays a crucial role in understanding bone mechanical properties and their role in fracture-risk ( Lloyd et al, 2015 ; Boskey et al, 2016 ; Donnelly et al, 2012 ; Tai et al, 2007 ; Wang et al, 2016 ; Demirtas et al, 2016 ; Gourion-Arsiquaud et al, 2010 ; Vennin et al, 2017 ; Yao et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain alterations in osteon architecture associate with decreased bone quality and increased fracture risk (Ascenzi et al, 2016; Bajaj et al, 2014; Barth et al, 1992; Demirtas et al, 2016; Diab et al, 2005; Geissler et al, 2015; George and Vashishth, 2005). For example, canal size increases in osteoporosis leading to more porous tissue (Barth et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heterogeneous makeup of the bone’s microstructure and lower-level hierarchy are generally attributed with the resistance of bone to fatigue and fracture. Remodeling restores heterogeneity, decreasing the local tissue age in the process (Abdel-Wahab et al, 2012; Ascenzi and Lomovtsev, 2006; Demirtas et al, 2016). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stiffness for the matrix was measured under wet conditions. Symbols used in the table: ~ approximate value interpreted from figures; K G calculated from a reported stress intensity factor K , where G = K 2 / E , assuming E = 20 GPa (Koester et al 2008); T transverse osteons (crack parallel to osteons); L longitudinal osteons (crack perpendicular to osteons) a Faingold et al (2014); b Nyman et al (2006); c Rho et al (1999); d Rho et al (2002); e Mullins et al (2009); f Hengsberger et al (2002); g Skedros et al (2005); h Milovanovic et al (2018); i Burr et al (1988); j Montalbano and Feng (2011); k Chan et al (2009); l Gargac et al (2014); m Gustafsson et al (2018b); n Sun et al (2010); o Dong et al (2005); p Bigley et al (2006); q Norman et al (1995); r Zimmermann et al (2009); s Koester et al (2008); t Nalla et al (2005); u Mullins et al (2009); v Abdel-Wahab et al (2012); w Li et al (2013); x Vergani et al (2014); y Budyn and Hoc (2007); z Baptista et al (2016); aa Idkaidek and Jasiuk (2017); ab Wang et al (2017); ac Idkaidek and Jasiuk (2017); ad Budyn et al (2008); ae Demirtas et al (2016); af Rodriguez-Florez et al (2017); ag Giner et al (2017); ah Mischinski and Ural (2011); ai Nobakhti et al (2014)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%