2018
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the dynamic response of unreinforced masonry structures using a macroelement modeling approach

Abstract: Summary The seismic performance of unreinforced masonry structures is strongly associated with the interaction between in‐plane and out‐of‐plane mechanisms. The seismic response of these structures has been thoroughly investigated by means of experimental testing, analytical procedures, and computational approaches. Within the framework of the numerical simulations, models based on the finite element method provide a good prediction of the seismic performance of unreinforced masonry structures. However, they u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the computational burden of the DMEM revealed to be high 39 and of particular concern in view of complex static and dynamic analyses. 44,45 In this paper, a new macro-model is proposed which aims to overcome the limits of both the diagonal strut model and the DMEM and ensure a satisfying accuracy in the simulation of the in-plane seismic response of IRCFS. The proposed model is composed of a shear deformable macro-element consisting of an articulated quadrilateral with a single diagonal non-linear link, connected to the adjacent elements by means of a set of concentrated 2D non-linear links-two contact links for each edge of the quadrilateral-simulating the coupled interaction between normal and tangential stresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, the computational burden of the DMEM revealed to be high 39 and of particular concern in view of complex static and dynamic analyses. 44,45 In this paper, a new macro-model is proposed which aims to overcome the limits of both the diagonal strut model and the DMEM and ensure a satisfying accuracy in the simulation of the in-plane seismic response of IRCFS. The proposed model is composed of a shear deformable macro-element consisting of an articulated quadrilateral with a single diagonal non-linear link, connected to the adjacent elements by means of a set of concentrated 2D non-linear links-two contact links for each edge of the quadrilateral-simulating the coupled interaction between normal and tangential stresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy allowed the static condensation of the degrees of freedom associated with the interface links and thus the reduction of the degrees of freedom of the system. Nonetheless, the computational burden of the DMEM revealed to be high and of particular concern in view of complex static and dynamic analyses …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DMEM has been employed to simulate the seismic behavior of monumental masonry constructions by means of non-linear static (push-over) analyses [20] [21]. Recently, the model has been extended to the dynamic field [12].…”
Section: The Adopted Discrete Macro-element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capability of the proposed DMEM to account for the in and out-of-plane behavior of masonry structure has been already numerically and experimentally investigated [12] [13]. In this paper the DMEM method is applied for evaluating the nonlinear dynamic response of a typical church façade subjected to earthquake loadings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases the interfaces, simulating the joints, are generally characterized by a unilateral (no-tension) normal-bond behaviour and a frictional-Coulomb, associated or non-associated, tangential-bond behaviour [1]- [4]. In addition, the seismic response of HMS is governed by a mutual interaction between the in-plane and out-of-plane behaviour [5]- [7] [6]. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate 3D capacity domains to characterise the contact joints in order to manage the torsion-shear-bending moment interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%