2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the cortical bone thickness by CT-scan and its association with orthodontic implant position in a young adult Eastern Mediterranean population: A cross sectional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The human skeleton can be divided into dense bone (cortical bone) and trabecular bone (cancellous bone). Dense bone is almost solid, while the porosity of trabecular bone varies between 50 and 90%, and the mechanical properties of the bone vary significantly with age, anatomical location, and bone mass ( Lei et al, 2013 ; Al-Hafidh et al, 2020 ; Gaffuri et al, 2021 ). Such complex mechanical property modulation is difficult to achieve with a single principal element alloy, which requires substantial elemental modulation by HEA to meet specific bone-implant needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human skeleton can be divided into dense bone (cortical bone) and trabecular bone (cancellous bone). Dense bone is almost solid, while the porosity of trabecular bone varies between 50 and 90%, and the mechanical properties of the bone vary significantly with age, anatomical location, and bone mass ( Lei et al, 2013 ; Al-Hafidh et al, 2020 ; Gaffuri et al, 2021 ). Such complex mechanical property modulation is difficult to achieve with a single principal element alloy, which requires substantial elemental modulation by HEA to meet specific bone-implant needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same software and methodology used in the present study were used in a study of cortical bone thickness measurements at the buccal and lingual sides of the upper and lower jaw by Al Hafidh et al [44]. The results for the region mesial to the upper molars were found to range from 1.35 mm to 1.76 mm, while moving gradually to 2, 4, 6, 8 mm distance from the CEJ for males, and from 1.36 mm to 1.64 mm for females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The qualitative measurement of bone mineral density is affected by irradiation dose, irradiation angle, observer subjectivity, and other factors, and when the mineral loss in bone is less than 30%, it can be difficult to recognize by the naked eye. The method of semiquantitative measurement of bone mineral density is usually expressed by different grades or degrees, which is not accurate and seldom used ( 20 ). Quantitative measurement methods mainly include single-photon absorption, two-photon absorption, dual energy X-ray absorption, and quantitative CT, among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%