2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12985-023-01986-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the clinical and analytical performance of the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay using the VALCOR protocol

Abstract: Background The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of diagnostic testing against curbing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. The urgent need and scale for diagnostic tools resulted in manufacturers of SARS-CoV-2 assays receiving emergency authorization that lacked robust analytical or clinical evaluation. As it is highly likely that testing for SARS-CoV-2 will continue to play a central role in public health, the performance characteristics of assays should be evaluated to ensure reliable diagno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining two positive samples were further tested with an adjudicator assay. One sample was positive on two other platforms [Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 assay and Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay ( 12 )] and categorized as positive. The remaining sample tested negative on two other platforms (Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 assay and Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay) and was categorized as negative.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The remaining two positive samples were further tested with an adjudicator assay. One sample was positive on two other platforms [Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 assay and Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay ( 12 )] and categorized as positive. The remaining sample tested negative on two other platforms (Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 assay and Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay) and was categorized as negative.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison with the performance of other validated SARS-CoV-2 assays, as reported in the literature, indicates that the Seegene Allplex SARS-CoV-2 assays perform at a level similar to the Aptima SARS-CoV-2 assay. The Aptima assay had also been validated using the VALCOR panel ( 12 ). In terms of sensitivity, the Seegene Allplex assays outperform the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assay, achieving a sensitivity of 93% ( 17 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations