1985
DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(85)90335-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the aluminum overload and of its possible toxicity in asymptomatic uremic patients: Evidence for a depressive effect on bone formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was not the case with our 1991 study (10) 10 in which aluminum‐phosphate binders had been excluded in 1980 (11), an important point since, independent of the PTH level, aluminum overload per se suppresses bone remodeling (12). This lack of aluminum intoxication is one explanation why our optimal PTH range (based on normal bone formation rate assessed by double tetracycline labeled bone biopsies) was lower (one to two times the upper limit of normal).…”
Section: What Is the Optimal Target Pth Range With Calcimimetic Use?mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This was not the case with our 1991 study (10) 10 in which aluminum‐phosphate binders had been excluded in 1980 (11), an important point since, independent of the PTH level, aluminum overload per se suppresses bone remodeling (12). This lack of aluminum intoxication is one explanation why our optimal PTH range (based on normal bone formation rate assessed by double tetracycline labeled bone biopsies) was lower (one to two times the upper limit of normal).…”
Section: What Is the Optimal Target Pth Range With Calcimimetic Use?mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The latter could have positive aluminum staining on their cement lines demonstrating that aluminum deposited at this initially mineralised osteoid bone interface had not prevented subsequent bone formation and mineralization. Sebert et al [13] in patients with mild aluminum overload (i.e. without posi tive aluminum staining of their bone biopsy) found the same increase of plasma aluminum after DFO and the same bone aluminum content (measured by inductively plasma emission spectrometry) in their patients with OF or ABD so that no linear correlation was found between BFR and the aluminum parameters.…”
Section: Evidences That Aluminum Cannot Be the Sole Culprit In The Pamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The absence of aluminum overload in these observations has however been excluded only on the negativity of the histological staining for aluminum (<5% of positive surface with aluminon) in patients who have been exposed routinely to aluminum phosphate binders and who may neverthe less have high bone aluminon content [13]: Hercz et al [82] have reported this pattern in 36% of 80 patients with ABD; Dunlay et al [83] have reported 8 such patients, 5, however, being diabetics, and shown that they had com parable PTH plasma levels for various levels of plasma calcium when compared with 17 patients with ABD and positive aluminon stainings. Marie et al [53] reported also 3 nonparathyroidectomized dialysis patients with ABD and negative aluminon staining.…”
Section: Evidence That Uremic Adynamic Bone Disease May Be Idiopathicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[14][15][16][17] This may be due to parenteral exposure to inadequately treated water for dialysis solutions and/or the use of large amounts of aluminum-containing phosphate binding agents for prolonged periods. 5,[18][19][20] In the last decade, the use of adequate water purification methods for the preparation of dialysis solutions and the avoidance of aluminum-containing gels for the control of hyperphosphatemia have significantly decreased the incidence of aluminum intoxication in dialyzed patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%