2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.02.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Accuracy and Reliability of Vascular Surgery Quality Metrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…62 However, errors and statistically invalid scores can be seen when small group sizes and inaccurate surgeon or service line attribution of patient outcomes are made. 63 Risk Adjustment: Registry Data Unlike administrative data, disease registries are usually constructed with robust risk adjustment in mind, with quality rather than billing as the primary purpose. Risk adjustment in these programs can rely on collection of key patient risk factors and postoperative complications by skilled abstractors.…”
Section: Methodology and Outcomes Risk Adjustment: Administrative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…62 However, errors and statistically invalid scores can be seen when small group sizes and inaccurate surgeon or service line attribution of patient outcomes are made. 63 Risk Adjustment: Registry Data Unlike administrative data, disease registries are usually constructed with robust risk adjustment in mind, with quality rather than billing as the primary purpose. Risk adjustment in these programs can rely on collection of key patient risk factors and postoperative complications by skilled abstractors.…”
Section: Methodology and Outcomes Risk Adjustment: Administrative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk adjustment within Vizient uses a proprietary risk adjustment tool comparing individual surgeon, service line, and hospital performance to benchmarks from a group of hospitals 62 . However, errors and statistically invalid scores can be seen when small group sizes and inaccurate surgeon or service line attribution of patient outcomes are made 63 …”
Section: Methodology and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%