PsycEXTRA Dataset 1991
DOI: 10.1037/e496212006-020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Teratogenic Effects on Cognitive and Behavioral Development in Infancy and Childhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FeBAD suggests that injury at a critical period of organ development may cause programmatic changes, which consequently results in alterations in gene expression leading to functional deficits later in life. Since growth of the brain takes place during prenatal and infantile periods, it is also known that perturbations during this time may lead to cognitive decline during adulthood (Conel 1939;Tanner 1978;Jacobson and Jacobson 1991). Furthermore, several studies have previously suggested a link between early-life disturbances (risk factors) and the development of AD (Graves et al 1996;Snowdon et al 1996;Abbott et al 1998).…”
Section: Developmental Disturbances Pb Exposure and Amyloidogenesismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…FeBAD suggests that injury at a critical period of organ development may cause programmatic changes, which consequently results in alterations in gene expression leading to functional deficits later in life. Since growth of the brain takes place during prenatal and infantile periods, it is also known that perturbations during this time may lead to cognitive decline during adulthood (Conel 1939;Tanner 1978;Jacobson and Jacobson 1991). Furthermore, several studies have previously suggested a link between early-life disturbances (risk factors) and the development of AD (Graves et al 1996;Snowdon et al 1996;Abbott et al 1998).…”
Section: Developmental Disturbances Pb Exposure and Amyloidogenesismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…4 Second, significant differences have been reported between cocaine‐exposed and non‐cocaine‐exposed groups on individual developmental domains, most notably speech and language for preschool‐aged children 7,104 as well as motor delays at least during the first year. 105 Third, standardized developmental assessments do not directly measure the domains of arousal and impulse regulation and attention modulation or more specific executive functions or information‐processing strategies, 106,107 areas for which there are conceptual reasons to hypothesize specific cocaine‐related effects on development. 108,109…”
Section: Neurobehavioral Profiles In Human Infants and Young Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atendiendo al hecho de que, tal y como se ha señalado anteriormente, en el mayor número de casos los efectos provocados por la exposición prenatal a drogas harían referencia a dominios cognitivos concretos, se ha señalado la necesidad de desarrollar instrumentos de evaluación más específi-cos que los habitualmente empleados 5,25,26 , caso de los índices de desarrollo mental y psicomotor de las Escalas Bayley de desarrollo infantil. A pesar de que han sido muy utilizadas en el estudio de los efectos de diversos teratógenos, las Escalas Bayley evalúan aspectos excesivamente generales y han demostrado tener poca validez predictiva en la competencia cogni-FIGURA 2: Efectos del consumo de drogas por la gestante tiva posterior cuando se emplea durante el primer año de vida 26 . En cuanto al momento en que se realiza la evaluación, una de las mayores críticas efectuadas en el ámbito de la exposición prenatal a sustancias radica precisamente en que la mayor parte de estudios se centran en las primeras semanas, meses o incluso años de vida 5 , lo que podría producir un solapamiento entre los efectos agudos y subagudos de la exposición, y alteraciones más permanentes 21 .…”
unclassified